A D V E R T |
I S E M E N T |
| Math Sites: lean ages 13-∞ readme referees parents | >>> MAITH GAMES <<< | all 372 compute stand |
|
LEVEL 1 OF 1 · $P=W$ for fixed-determinant moduli spaces
P=W in composite rank for fixed determinant
expertly designed by an internal OpenAI model · released 2026-09-24
· original PDF
IntroductionNonabelian Hodge theory identifies two moduli spaces whose cohomology carries very different geometric filtrations. On the Higgs-bundle side, the Hitchin map defines the perverse Leray filtration. On the character-variety side, the mixed Hodge structure defines the weight filtration. The \(P=W\) conjecture asserts that these filtrations coincide after doubling the indices of the first. The geometric setting comes from Hitchin’s moduli spaces and integrable systems (N. J. Hitchin 1987; N. Hitchin 1987). The analytic correspondence rests on the foundational work of Hitchin, Donaldson, Corlette, and Simpson (N. J. Hitchin 1987; Donaldson 1987; Corlette 1988; Simpson 1992). We use its twisted, fixed-determinant form, including the action by torsion line bundles, as described by Hausel and Thaddeus (Hausel and Thaddeus 2003, sec. 2 and 5). Let \(C\) be a smooth projective complex curve of genus \(g\ge2\). Fix an integer \(n\ge2\), an integer \(d\) coprime to \(n\), and a line bundle \(L\in\mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}^d(C)\). Write \[X=M_{\mathrm{Dol}}^L(\mathop{\mathrm{SL}}_n)\] for the moduli space of stable rank-\(n\) Higgs bundles \((E,\theta)\) with \(\det E\simeq L\) and \(\mathop{\mathrm{tr}}\theta=0\). Here stability means that every proper nonzero \(\theta\)-invariant subbundle has slope smaller than \(d/n\). Its Hitchin map is \[h:X\longrightarrow A=\bigoplus_{i=2}^nH^0(C,K_C^i),\] given by the coefficients of the characteristic polynomial. Put \[R=(n^2-1)(g-1),\qquad b=\frac{n(n-1)}2, \qquad \zeta=\exp(2\pi\sqrt{-1}d/n).\] The corresponding twisted character variety is \[ X^B=\left\{(A_1,B_1,\ldots,A_g,B_g)\in\mathop{\mathrm{SL}}_n(\mathbb C)^{2g}: \prod_{j=1}^g[A_j,B_j]=\zeta I_n\right\}\mathbin{/\mkern-6mu/}\mathop{\mathrm{SL}}_n(\mathbb C), \tag{1}\] where the group acts by simultaneous conjugation and \([A,B]=ABA^{-1}B^{-1}\). Coprimality makes both spaces smooth and makes every representation in (1) irreducible. Nonabelian Hodge theory gives a diffeomorphism between them (Hausel and Thaddeus 2003; Simpson 1997). We use rational cohomology unless complex coefficients are indicated. The Hitchin map is proper, \(\dim X=2R\), \(\dim A=R\), and \[\dim(X\times_A X)-\dim X=R.\] Thus the standard \(P=W\) normalization is \[ P_kH^m(X)=\mathop{\mathrm{im}}\left\{ H^{m-R}\!\left(A,{}^p\tau_{\le k}Rh_*\mathbb Q_X[R]\right) \longrightarrow H^m(X)\right\}. \tag{2}\] Here \({}^p\tau\) denotes truncation for the middle perverse \(t\)-structure. We recall the dimension and shift conventions in Section 2. Transport \(P\) to \(H^*(X^B)\) by nonabelian Hodge theory, and let \(W\) denote Deligne’s weight filtration there (Deligne 1971, 1974). Theorem 1. For every smooth projective complex curve \(C\) of genus \(g\ge2\), every composite integer \(n\ge4\), every integer \(d\) with \(\gcd(n,d)=1\), and every \(L\in\mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}^d(C)\), one has \[P_kH^m(X^B,\mathbb Q)=W_{2k}H^m(X^B,\mathbb Q) =W_{2k+1}H^m(X^B,\mathbb Q)\] for all \(m,k\ge0\). The assertion concerns the entire cohomology. The group \(\Gamma=\mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}^0(C)[n]\) acts on \(X\) by tensor product. Its averaging projector \[\operatorname{av}_{\Gamma}=\frac1{|\Gamma|}\sum_{\gamma\in\Gamma}\gamma^*\] has image \(H^*(X,\mathbb Q)^\Gamma\) and kernel the variant cohomology \(H^*_{\mathrm{var}}(X,\mathbb Q)\). Thus, after complexification, the theorem includes every nontrivial \(\Gamma\)-character, not only the invariant part. Combining Theorem 1 with the established prime-rank cases (Maulik and Shen 2024, Theorem 0.3) resolves the smooth coprime fixed-determinant, trace-free \(P=W\) conjecture in every rank \(n\ge2\). History and the fixed-determinant problemThe weight symmetries behind \(P=W\) arose from the arithmetic study of character varieties by Hausel and Rodriguez-Villegas (Hausel and Rodriguez-Villegas 2008), extended to generic puncture data by Hausel, Letellier, and Rodriguez-Villegas (Hausel et al. 2011). De Cataldo, Hausel, and Migliorini formulated the filtration comparison and established it in rank two (Cataldo et al. 2012). Their theorem relates the topology of an algebraic integrable system to the mixed Hodge theory of an affine character variety: relative hard Lefschetz on the Higgs side explains curious hard Lefschetz on the Betti side. Tautological classes have been central to the higher-rank problem. For \(\mathop{\mathrm{GL}}_n\), generation by these classes was established in rank two by Hausel and Thaddeus (Hausel and Thaddeus 2004) and in arbitrary rank by Markman (Markman 2002, Theorem 7); Shende determined their Betti weights (Shende 2017). De Cataldo, Maulik, and Shen proved \(P=W\) for \(\mathop{\mathrm{GL}}_n\) in genus two and obtained the required perversity bounds for tautological classes in arbitrary genus (M. A. de Cataldo et al. 2022, Theorems 0.2 and 0.4–0.6). Maulik and Shen proved the coprime \(\mathop{\mathrm{GL}}_n\) conjecture in arbitrary rank and genus (Maulik and Shen 2024). Further proofs use the Hecke-algebra action of Hausel, Mellit, Minets, and Schiffmann (Hausel et al. 2025) and the Fourier-transform method of Maulik, Shen, and Yin (Maulik et al. 2025, Theorem 0.4). For fixed determinant, the quotient by \(\Gamma\) detects the invariant cohomology, and the projective tautological generation theorem applies to this quotient (Maulik and Shen 2024, Theorem 2.1(i)). It does not generate the variant part. De Cataldo, Maulik, and Shen determined the two filtrations on the variant part in prime rank and reduced \(\mathop{\mathrm{SL}}_p\) to \(\mathop{\mathrm{GL}}_p\) (M. A. A. de Cataldo et al. 2022); together with the general \(\mathop{\mathrm{GL}}_p\) theorem, this gives the prime-rank cases cited above. In arbitrary rank, Maulik and Shen constructed endoscopic correspondences compatible with the perverse filtrations (Maulik and Shen 2021, Theorem 5.4), without identifying the full filtrations in composite rank. Corollary 31 combines our all-rank equality with cover-side \(\mathop{\mathrm{GL}}_r\) \(P=W\) to give the exact Betti-weight image equality asked in (Maulik and Shen 2021, Question 5.5), for the canonical-twist operator transported by nonabelian Hodge theory. Our argument constructs an operator on the full cohomology, before taking \(\Gamma\)-invariants. Its algebraic pattern follows the common \(\mathfrak{sl}_2\) structure and flag-correspondence methods of Hausel, Mellit, Minets, and Schiffmann (Hausel et al. 2025, Proposition 7.9 and Section 8). The fixed-determinant construction requires two further geometric steps. First, we pull Mellit’s toric stratifications through a determinant-root cover and prove integral local constancy and ordinary base change. The inputs include the relative product stratification over ordered eigenvalues, including collisions (Mellit 2025, sec. 7.4, Theorem 7.5, and proof of Proposition 8.7). This yields curious hard Lefschetz on the full fixed-determinant cohomology, rather than only its invariant part. Second, we use a finite diagram of algebraic fibers to give weight zero to the cochains of a topological moving-point base. Shende used this weight convention for simplicial bases and tautological classes (Shende 2017, proof of the main Theorem). Here the construction also carries variations and proper Gysin maps, using mixed Hodge modules and their coherent enhancement (Saito 1990; Tubach 2025). Its finite weight-graded monodromy supplies the lowering operator. These diagram weights are distinct from the usual weights of an algebraic moving-point curve; that distinction is needed for integration over the curve to have weight shift zero. The operator behind the comparisonThe universal projective bundle on \(C\times X\) has local vector-bundle lifts \(\mathcal E\). The following characteristic class is independent of the lift and descends to \(C\times X\); integration over \(C\) gives \[e=\int_C\left(\mathop{\mathrm{ch}}_2(\mathcal E)-\frac{c_1(\mathcal E)^2}{2n}\right) =\frac1{2n}\int_C\mathop{\mathrm{ch}}_2(\mathop{\mathrm{End}}\mathcal E)\in H^2(X).\] We also write \(e\) for cup product by this class. Section 2 proves that \(H^2(X)=\mathbb Qe\) and that \(e\) satisfies relative hard Lefschetz, with center \(R\). Section 3 proves curious hard Lefschetz for the same class and the half-weight grading, again with center \(R\). It remains to construct one degree-\(-2\) operator \(f\) such that \[ fP_k\subset P_{k-2},\qquad fW_j\subset W_{j-4},\qquad [[f,e],e]=-2e. \tag{3}\] An elementary Lefschetz-module argument then identifies both filtrations as sums of eigenspaces of the same operator \([e,f]\). It also handles extensions between filtration grades. To construct \(f\), allow one logarithmic pole, move it over a finite cover \(S\to C\), and choose a full flag at the pole. The logarithmic \(\lambda\)-connection parameter interpolates between Higgs bundles at \(\lambda=0\) and connections at \(\lambda=1\). The underlying moduli constructions and semistable reduction come from (Cataldo and Fernandez Herrero 2024; Fernandez Herrero and Zhang 2025); the restriction argument uses the semiprojective geometry of (Hausel and Rodriguez-Villegas 2015). We verify the fixed determinant, residue, and flag conditions, as well as compatibility with the full nonabelian-Hodge identification. Write \(X_\lambda\) for the fixed-pole scalar-residue moduli space, with \(X_0=X\). At scalar residue, the flag space fits into a correspondence \[X_\lambda\xleftarrow{\ \mathop{\mathrm{pr}}\ }S\times X_\lambda \xleftarrow{\ \pi\ }Z_\lambda \xrightarrow{\ \iota\ }Y_{\lambda,0}.\] Here \(Y_{\lambda,0}\) permits a flag-preserving residue with prescribed scalar diagonal, while \(Z_\lambda\) requires the residue itself to be scalar. We first deform the ordered residues to distinct values and shift two residue eigenline lattices in opposite directions. Restriction isomorphisms from the total logarithmic Hodge family transport the resulting translation to a degree-zero operator \(T\) on \(H^*(Y_{\lambda,0})\). On the connection side, \(T\) is eigenvalue monodromy. A power has unipotent action, and its logarithm \(N\) lowers the diagram weights by two. At \(\lambda=0\), the resulting operator, before multiplication by a nonzero scalar, is \[f'=\mathop{\mathrm{pr}}_*\pi_*\iota^*N^2\iota_*\pi^*\mathop{\mathrm{pr}}^*.\] The flag shifts cancel. The square \(N^2\) lowers weights by four, and integration over \(S\) has weight shift zero in the diagram construction. On the Higgs side, nearby cycles realize this same operator as a morphism \(Rh_*\mathbb Q_X\to Rh_*\mathbb Q_X[-2]\), giving the perverse bound. A lattice Riemann–Roch calculation then gives the double commutator in (3) after explicit rescaling. The proof keeps three comparison statements separate: ordinary base change for the Betti family, restriction isomorphisms for the logarithmic Hodge family, and specialization over the Hitchin base. Each is proved with its own hypotheses. Section 2 gives the Lefschetz comparison criterion. Section 3 proves ordinary base change and curious hard Lefschetz for the full fixed-determinant Betti family. Section 4 constructs the diagram weights, and Section 5 establishes the logarithmic restriction isomorphisms and full-cohomology comparison. Section 6 constructs the common operator and proves its weight bound; Section 7 proves its perverse bound by specialization. Section 8 computes the double commutator, and Section 9 assembles these results to prove Theorem 1. Lefschetz operators and the comparison criterionFor the proof of Theorem 1, assume that \(n\ge4\) is composite. We first fix the perverse normalization and identify a common candidate for the two Lefschetz operators. We then give the linear-algebra argument that will compare the filtrations once a common lowering operator has been constructed. Throughout this section, cohomology has rational coefficients. The normalized perverse filtrationRecall that \(X\) parametrizes stable, trace-free Higgs bundles of rank \(n\) and determinant \(L\) on \(C\), and that \(h:X\to A\) is its Hitchin map. The standard geometry of this system gives a proper surjective morphism from a smooth quasi-projective variety, together with a holomorphic symplectic form of weight one for Higgs-field scaling; see (M. A. A. de Cataldo et al. 2022, sec. 1.1). Lemma 2. Set \(R=(n^2-1)(g-1)\). Then \(\dim X=2R\), \(\dim A=R\), and every fiber of \(h\) has dimension \(R\). In particular, \[r:=\dim(X\times_A X)-\dim X=R.\] Proof. Riemann–Roch gives \[\dim A=\sum_{i=2}^n h^0(C,K_C^i) =\sum_{i=2}^n(2i-1)(g-1)=R.\] The trace-free Higgs deformation complex has vanishing zeroth and second hypercohomology, by stability and Serre duality. Its Euler characteristic is \(-2R\), so the tangent space has dimension \(2R\) at every point. We recall why the fiber bound holds also over the singular Hitchin values. Higgs-field scaling makes \(X\) semiprojective: properness of \(h\) extends each scaling orbit at zero, since its Hitchin value extends there, and the fixed locus is closed in the proper fiber \(h^{-1}(0)\). For the Białynicki–Birula decomposition (Białynicki-Birula 1973) in this semiprojective setting, see (Hausel and Rodriguez-Villegas 2015, sec. 1.2). At a fixed point, the symplectic form pairs a tangent weight \(w\) with weight \(1-w\). The weights are integers, so the nonpositive tangent weights account for exactly half the tangent dimension. Consequently each repelling stratum, including its fixed component, has dimension \(R\). The union of these strata is \(h^{-1}(0)\). Indeed, a point with a limit at infinity must have zero Hitchin value, because every Hitchin coordinate has positive scaling weight. Conversely, an orbit in \(h^{-1}(0)\) has a limit at infinity because that fiber is proper. Thus \(\dim h^{-1}(0)=R\). Pulling \(h\) back along the weighted scaling curve from any \(a\in A\) to zero, upper semicontinuity of fiber dimension for a proper morphism gives \(\dim h^{-1}(a)\le R\). The dimension inequality for a morphism from a smooth \(2R\)-dimensional variety to an \(R\)-dimensional variety gives the reverse inequality on each nonempty fiber. Surjectivity therefore proves the asserted equidimensionality. It follows that \(\dim(X\times_A X)=R+2R=3R\). ◻ Put \[K=Rh_*\mathbb Q_X[R].\] We normalize the perverse filtration by \[ P_kH^m(X)=\operatorname{Im}\left\{ H^{m-R}\bigl(A,{}^p\tau_{\le k}K\bigr) \longrightarrow H^m(X)\right\}. \tag{4}\] This is the normalization of (Maulik and Shen 2024, sec. 1.1). The fiber bound implies that \(Rh_*\mathbb Q_X[2R]\) has perverse cohomology only in degrees \([-R,R]\): the upper bound follows from the support criterion, and the lower bound follows by Verdier duality. Indeed its ordinary stalk cohomology vanishes in positive degrees, and every support has dimension at most \(R\). After shifting by \([-R]\), the perverse degrees of \(K\) lie in \([0,2R]\). In particular, \[ P_{-1}H^*(X)=0,\qquad P_{2R}H^*(X)=H^*(X). \tag{5}\] We will use the following shift convention repeatedly. A morphism \(K\to K[s]\) induces a map of cohomological degree \(s\) sending \(P_k\) into \(P_{k+s}\), since \[ {}^p\tau_{\le k}(K[s]) =({}^p\tau_{\le k+s}K)[s]. \tag{6}\] Thus an actual morphism \(Rh_*\mathbb Q_X\to Rh_*\mathbb Q_X[-2]\) will supply precisely the lowering bound needed below. The degree-two classThe universal projective bundle on \(C\times X\) determines the characteristic class \[\widetilde{\operatorname{ch}}_2(E) =\operatorname{ch}_2(E)-\frac{c_1(E)^2}{2n} =\frac{1}{2n}\operatorname{ch}_2(\operatorname{End}E).\] The last expression also defines it when a universal vector bundle has not been chosen. Define \[ e=\int_C\widetilde{\operatorname{ch}}_2(E)\in H^2(X). \tag{7}\] We also write \(e\) for cup product by this class. Lemma 3. For the composite ranks \(n\ge4\) under consideration, \[H^0(X)=\mathbb Q,\qquad H^1(X)=0,\qquad H^2(X)=\mathbb Q e, \qquad e\ne0.\] Every ample class on \(X\) is a nonzero scalar multiple of \(e\). Proof. The finite group \(\Gamma=\operatorname{Pic}^0(C)[n]\) acts on \(X\) by tensor product. Averaging over \(\Gamma\) decomposes rational cohomology into its invariant summand and its complementary variant summand. Let \(p\) be the smallest prime divisor of \(n\), and put \[c=n(n-n/p)(g-1).\] Proposition 1.4 of (M. A. A. de Cataldo et al. 2022), which applies to arbitrary rank, gives \[H^i_{\mathrm{var}}(X)=P_{i-c}H^i_{\mathrm{var}}(X).\] Here \(c\ge n^2/2\ge8\), so (5) makes the variant summand vanish in degrees \(0\), \(1\), and \(2\). The invariant summand is the rational cohomology of the corresponding \(\mathrm{PGL}_n\) moduli space. Markman’s generation theorem (Markman 2002, Theorem 7), in the projective-bundle formulation of (Maulik and Shen 2024, Theorem 2.1(i)), states that this algebra is generated by the Künneth components of the projective Chern characters with indices \(j\ge2\). These components have degrees \(2j\), \(2j-1\), and \(2j-2\) on the moduli space. There are therefore no degree-one generators and only one possible degree-two generator, namely a nonzero normalization of the expression defining \(e\). This proves \(H^0(X)=\mathbb Q\), \(H^1(X)=0\), and \(H^2(X)=\mathbb Q e\), with nonvanishing still to be checked. Choose an ample line bundle on \(X\). By Lemma 2, a Hitchin fiber is projective of positive dimension, and hence contains an integral projective curve. The ample bundle has positive degree on that curve, so its first Chern class is nonzero in \(H^2(X)\). The one-dimensional upper bound just proved now gives \(e\ne0\) and the final assertion. ◻ Proposition 4. Cup product by \(e\) sends \(P_kH^m(X)\) into \(P_{k+2}H^{m+2}(X)\). For every \(i\ge0\) and every \(m\), it induces an isomorphism \[ e^i:\operatorname{Gr}^P_{R-i}H^m(X) \xrightarrow{\ \sim\ } \operatorname{Gr}^P_{R+i}H^{m+2i}(X). \tag{8}\] Proof. The filtration shift follows from (6) applied to the cup-product morphism. Choose an ample class on \(X\), which is also relatively ample for the proper morphism \(h\), making \(h\) projective. The decomposition theorem and relative hard Lefschetz (Beilinson et al. 1982, Theorems 6.2.5 and 6.2.10) give (8) for that class: the perverse degrees of \(Rh_*\mathbb Q_X[2R]\) have center zero, and the shift to \(K\) moves the center to \(R\). The decomposition theorem also makes the perverse cohomology spectral sequence degenerate, so these sheaf-theoretic isomorphisms give the displayed isomorphisms on associated-graded cohomology. Lemma 3 replaces the ample class by a nonzero scalar multiple of \(e\), without changing invertibility. ◻ A common lowering operator determines the filtrationFor a finite graded vector space \(V=\bigoplus_k V_k\) and a degree-two operator \(E\), say that \(E\) is Lefschetz with center \(r\) if \[E^i:V_{r-i}\xrightarrow{\sim}V_{r+i} \quad\text{for every }i\ge0.\] Here \(r\) is an integer, and grades outside the finite support are zero. Proposition 4 gives this property for the total perverse associated graded, with center \(R\). The next statement explains the role of the lowering operator in the proof. The use of an \(\mathfrak{sl}_2\)-operator to determine the perverse filtration is also central to (Hausel et al. 2025, Propositions 7.9 and 8.2–8.3). We prove the precise two-filtration criterion needed here, including the passage from associated gradeds to the filtrations themselves. Proposition 5 (Comparison by a common lowering operator). Let \(H\) be a finite-dimensional vector space over a field of characteristic zero, with finite, exhaustive, separated increasing integer-indexed filtrations \(F_\bullet\) and \(G_\bullet\). Suppose that \(e,f\in\operatorname{End}(H)\) satisfy, for \(A_\bullet=F_\bullet\) and \(A_\bullet=G_\bullet\), \[e(A_k)\subseteq A_{k+2},\qquad f(A_k)\subseteq A_{k-2}.\] Assume that the induced raiser on each associated graded is Lefschetz with the same center \(r\), and that \[ [[f,e],e]=-2e, \qquad [u,v]=uv-vu. \tag{9}\] Then \(F_k=G_k\) for every integer \(k\). If \(H\) has a further grading respected by both filtrations, and \(e,f\) have degrees \(2,-2\) for that grading, the equality holds degree by degree. Proof. Fix either associated graded, and denote its raiser by \(E\). The Lefschetz decomposition expresses it as a sum of primitive strings \[v,Ev,\ldots,E^\ell v,\qquad \deg v=r-\ell.\] On each string set \[F_0(E^jv)=j(\ell-j+1)E^{j-1}v.\] If \(H_0\) acts by \(k-r\) on grade \(k\), direct calculation gives \[[E,F_0]=H_0,\qquad [H_0,E]=2E,\qquad [H_0,F_0]=-2F_0.\] Thus \((E,H_0,F_0)\) is an \(\mathfrak{sl}_2\)-triple, and \([[F_0,E],E]=-2E\). We claim that a degree \(-2\) endomorphism satisfying this last identity must equal \(F_0\). On the endomorphism space, the adjoint \(\mathfrak{sl}_2\)-action identifies grading degree \(-2\) with \(H_0\)-weight \(-2\). Decompose this finite-dimensional representation into irreducibles. In any irreducible summand containing weight \(-2\), two raising steps map that weight space nontrivially to weight \(2\). Consequently \[(\operatorname{ad}E)^2: \operatorname{End}(\operatorname{Gr}^A H)_{-2} \longrightarrow \operatorname{End}(\operatorname{Gr}^A H)_{2}\] is injective. Applying this to \(\operatorname{Gr}^A(f)-F_0\) and (9) proves the claim. It follows that the single operator \(h_0=[e,f]\) on \(H\) preserves both filtrations and acts on their grade \(k\) by \(k-r\). Choose integers \(a\le b\) containing all their nonzero grades. For either filtration, \[(h_0-(k-r))A_k\subseteq A_{k-1}.\] Applying these factors successively from \(k=b\) down to \(k=a\) gives \[\prod_{k=a}^b(h_0-(k-r))=0.\] The polynomial has distinct roots, so \(h_0\) is semisimple. Every \(h_0\)-stable subspace is therefore the direct sum of its intersections with the eigenspaces. If a nonzero eigenvector first belongs to \(A_j\), its image in \(\operatorname{Gr}^A_jH\) shows that its eigenvalue is \(j-r\). Since each \(A_k\) is \(h_0\)-stable, this proves \[ A_k=\bigoplus_{j\le k}\ker\bigl(h_0-(j-r)\bigr). \tag{10}\] The right side is independent of the choice of filtration, proving \(F_k=G_k\). In the additionally graded setting, \(h_0\) has degree zero, so its eigenspaces and (10) decompose degree by degree. ◻ We also record a cancellation fact for the Betti Lefschetz argument. Lemma 6. Let \(V,W\) be nonzero finite integer-graded vector spaces over a field of characteristic zero, and let \(E_V,E_W\) have degree two. If \(E_V\otimes1+1\otimes E_W\) is Lefschetz with center \(r\) on \(V\otimes W\), then \(E_V\) and \(E_W\) are Lefschetz with centers \(r_V,r_W\), respectively, where \(r_V+r_W=r\). Proof. Choose homogeneous Jordan-string decompositions for the two operators, which are nilpotent because the gradings have finite support. The tensor product of any pair of strings is a graded invariant direct summand, with invariant complement, for the sum operator. Each Lefschetz isomorphism is block diagonal with respect to these summands, so it is an isomorphism on each of them. For a string whose lowest and highest grades are \(p\) and \(q\), call \((p+q)/2\) its center. The average of the lowest and highest grades of a tensor product of two strings is the sum of their centers. Its Lefschetz symmetry forces that sum to equal \(r\), for every pair of strings. Fixing one string in either factor shows that all strings in the other factor have the same center. A Jordan string is Lefschetz about its own center, which proves the conclusion. ◻ We will apply Proposition 5 to total cohomology, with \(F_k=P_k\) and \(G_k=W_{2k}\) under nonabelian Hodge theory. Section 3 proves that \(e\) is also Lefschetz for the half-weight grading, with center \(R\), and that all odd weight-graded pieces vanish. The remaining geometric construction supplies one operator \(f:H^m(X)\to H^{m-2}(X)\) satisfying both lowering bounds and (9). The proposition then identifies the two filtrations in every cohomological degree; the separate even-weight assertion gives \(W_{2k}=W_{2k+1}\). Curious hard Lefschetz on the full character varietyWe now establish the Betti Lefschetz statement needed for the comparison criterion. The point requiring care is the full cohomology of the fixed-determinant space. We obtain it from a finite cover of a \(\mathrm{GL}_n\) family, retaining every component of every lifted stratum. For a finite-dimensional vector space graded by half weights, a class of cohomological degree two and weight four acts with grading degree two. We say it satisfies Lefschetz with center \(c\) if its \(i\)th power is an isomorphism from grade \(c-i\) to grade \(c+i\), in the corresponding cohomological degrees, for every \(i\geq0\). A mixed Hodge structure is Hodge–Tate if its odd weight-graded pieces vanish and its weight-\(2r\) piece has only Hodge type \((r,r)\). Theorem 7. The mixed Hodge structure on \(H^*(X^{\mathrm B},\mathbb Q)\) is Hodge–Tate. Under the nonabelian-Hodge identification, the class \(e\) has nonzero image in \(\operatorname{Gr}^W_4H^2(X^{\mathrm B},\mathbb Q)\), and \[e^i:\operatorname{Gr}^W_{2R-2i}H^m(X^{\mathrm B},\mathbb Q) \xrightarrow{\ \sim\ } \operatorname{Gr}^W_{2R+2i}H^{m+2i}(X^{\mathrm B},\mathbb Q) \qquad(i\geq0).\] In particular, \(W_{2k}=W_{2k+1}\) on this cohomology. These assertions concern the entire cohomology, including all nontrivial \(\Gamma\)-character summands after complexification. The ordered family and its scalar fiberLet \[V=\left\{(t_1,\ldots,t_n)\in(\mathbb C^*)^n: \prod_i t_i=1,\quad \prod_{i\in I}t_i\ne1\text{ for }\varnothing\ne I\subsetneq\{1,\ldots,n\} \right\}, \qquad q=(\zeta,\ldots,\zeta).\] The space \(V\) is a connected smooth open subset of a torus, and \(q\in V\) since \(\zeta\) has order \(n\). Write \(\nu=\prod_{j=1}^g[A_j,B_j]\). The fiber \(Y^{\mathrm B}_t\) parametrizes tuples \((A_1,B_1,\ldots,A_g,B_g)\in\mathrm{SL}_n^{2g}\) together with a full flag preserved by \(\nu\), on whose ordered graded lines \(\nu\) acts by \(t_1,\ldots,t_n\), modulo simultaneous conjugation. Repeated eigenvalues are allowed. Every such tuple is irreducible. Indeed, on a common invariant proper subspace the determinant of \(\nu\) is one, while its eigenvalues form a proper nonempty submultiset of the \(t_i\). This contradicts the definition of \(V\). Thus conjugation gives geometric quotients by a free \(\mathrm{PGL}_n\) action. They may be constructed by the usual étale-local principal-bundle charts on irreducible tuples; with a full flag, these charts can also be obtained by completing its first line to a basis using words in the matrices. Lemma 8. The morphism \(Y^{\mathrm B}\to V\) is smooth of relative dimension \(2R+2b\). There is a correspondence \[X^{\mathrm B}\xleftarrow{\ \pi\ }Z^{\mathrm B} \xrightarrow{\ \iota\ }Y^{\mathrm B}_q,\] where \(Z^{\mathrm B}\) imposes \(\nu=\zeta I\) and \(\pi\) is the full flag bundle. The map \(\iota\) is a regular embedding of codimension \(b\) with normal bundle \(T_\pi^*\). The cohomological operators \[\mathsf A=\pi_*\iota^*,\qquad \mathsf B=\iota_*\pi^*\] have degrees \(-2b\) and \(2b\), respectively, and satisfy \[ \mathsf A\mathsf B=(-1)^b n!\,\mathrm{id}. \tag{11}\] Here and below a covariant star denotes the Gysin map. Proof. The commutator-product map is a submersion at every irreducible tuple. We give the differential check. For a pair \(a,b'\) set \(c=ab'a^{-1}b'^{-1}\). Its right-translated differential has terms \[(1-\operatorname{Ad}_{ab'a^{-1}})u,\qquad (\operatorname{Ad}_a-\operatorname{Ad}_c)v.\] Using the trace pairing, an annihilating vector \(z\) is fixed by \(ab'a^{-1}\) and satisfies \(\operatorname{Ad}_{a^{-1}}z=\operatorname{Ad}_{b'}z\). It is therefore fixed by \(ab'\), hence by \(a\) and \(b'\). For a product of commutators one applies this argument to the testing vector conjugated by each prefix. Since the vector is fixed by the current commutator, it stays unchanged from one pair to the next. It consequently centralizes every matrix. Irreducibility forces a scalar, and the trace-free condition forces zero. The space of a matrix in a flag Borel, with its flag, is smooth over its ordered diagonal torus, with fibers of dimension \(2b\). Pulling this space back along the submersion and then taking the free quotient gives smoothness. The relative dimension is \[2g(n^2-1)+2b-2(n^2-1)=2R+2b.\] At \(q\), the section \(\zeta^{-1}\nu-I\) takes values in the nilradical bundle over the flag space. Its zero locus is \(Z^{\mathrm B}\), and submersivity proves that this section is regular. The trace pairing identifies the nilradical with the dual of the flag tangent space, so its associated bundle is \(T_\pi^*\). Self-intersection and the projection formula now give \[\mathsf A\mathsf B(\alpha) =\pi_*\bigl(c_b(T_\pi^*)\pi^*\alpha\bigr) =(-1)^b\chi(\mathrm{Fl}_n)\alpha =(-1)^b n!\alpha.\] All constructions descend through \(\mathrm{PGL}_n\) and apply to full cohomology. ◻ Lifting the toric stratificationsSet \(D_1=(\mathbb C^*)^{2g}\) and \(\widehat Y^{\mathrm B}=Y^{\mathrm B}\times D_1\). Multiplying each of the \(2g\) matrices by its corresponding scalar gives \[ \widehat Y^{\mathrm B}\longrightarrow Y^{\mathrm B}_{\mathrm{GL}}, \tag{12}\] where the target is the same ordered family with matrices in \(\mathrm{GL}_n\). This is the pullback of the \(n\)th-power map on the \(2g\) determinant coordinates, hence is finite étale of degree \(n^{2g}\). Its source is the indicated product: dividing by the chosen determinant roots gives matrices in \(\mathrm{SL}_n\), without changing commutators or flags. We use Mellit’s toric stratifications of the \(\mathrm{GL}_n\) family (Mellit 2025). To identify the family exactly, take two punctures with first monodromy \(\zeta^{-1}I\) and last monodromy \(\zeta\nu^{-1}\). The latter has ordered eigenvalues \((\zeta t_i^{-1})_i\). The product relation is \(\nu\zeta^{-1}I\cdot\zeta\nu^{-1}=I\), and the genericity condition of (Mellit 2025, Definition 4.9) is precisely the subproduct condition in the definition of \(V\). Its identity last monodromy corresponds to \(q\). The ordering condition in that reference is automatic for the scalar first monodromy and for the distinct-eigenvalue last monodromy. We recall the two features of the stratifications which will be used. First, at a parameter with distinct \(t_i\), an auxiliary rank-\(b\) vector bundle over \(Y^{\mathrm B}_{\mathrm{GL},t}\) has a finite stratification refined into vector bundles over products of tori and affine spaces. The restriction of Mellit’s degree-two class gives compact-support curious Lefschetz on every final stratum, with the same middle weight. If \(\delta=\dim Y^{\mathrm B}_{\mathrm{GL},t}\), that middle actual weight is \(\delta+2b\); removal of the vector-bundle shift gives \(\delta\) (Mellit 2025, Theorem 6.14, Section 7.4, and Theorem 7.5). Second, over all of \(V\), an auxiliary affine bundle of rank \(b\) has a finite stratification whose refinements are vector bundles over \[\mathbb A^a\times(\mathbb C^*)^s\times V\] with structural map the projection to \(V\) (Mellit 2025, proof of Proposition 8.7). These assertions are about the final torus–affine refinements, not about arbitrary braid strata occurring earlier in their construction. Here is the additional finite-cover argument needed for (12). Lemma 9. Pulling the preceding auxiliary bundles and stratifications back along (12) has the following consequences.
Proof. Consider first a final stratum \(F=(\mathbb C^*)^s\times\mathbb A^a\), or a vector bundle over such a stratum. Its homotopy type is that of a torus. Each connected component \(\widetilde F\) of its finite étale preimage corresponds to a finite-index subgroup of \(\mathbb Z^s\). The pullback \[H^*(F,\mathbb Q)\longrightarrow H^*(\widetilde F,\mathbb Q)\] is therefore an isomorphism: both rings are the exterior algebras of the rational duals of these lattices. Since the map is algebraic, it is an isomorphism of mixed Hodge structures. Both spaces are smooth of the same dimension, and finite-degree trace together with Poincaré duality gives the same assertion for compact supports. These isomorphisms commute with cup product by the pulled-back class. We apply this argument to each connected component separately. The cohomology of a disconnected preimage is their direct sum, and all components have the same Lefschetz center. Preimages of the closed filtration of the original stratification still give a finite closed filtration. In the compact-support localization sequences, strictness of mixed Hodge morphisms (Deligne 1971, Theorem 2.3.5) permits passage to weight-gradeds. Comparing these exact sequences by a fixed power of the common class and using the five lemma passes the Lefschetz isomorphisms from the strata to the entire auxiliary space. The same sequences show that its cohomology is Hodge–Tate. The pulled-back auxiliary bundle has the same rank \(b\). Its Thom isomorphism shifts cohomological degree and actual weight by \(2b\). Thus the compact-support middle weight drops from \(\delta+2b\) to \(\delta\). Smooth Poincaré duality sends weight \(w\) to \(2\delta-w\), so ordinary cohomology has the same middle weight \(\delta\), or center \(\delta/2\) in half weights. The relative product stratification proves the Hodge–Tate assertion on every fiber, including repeated eigenvalues, by the same componentwise argument and the affine-bundle Thom isomorphism. For integral local constancy, use the relative stratification and choose a small contractible analytic open set \(U\subset V\). A finite cover of \(F\times U\) is pulled back from a finite cover of \(F\), since \(\pi_1(F\times U)=\pi_1(F)\). The same statement holds for the total space of a vector bundle over \(F\times U\), which is homotopy equivalent to its base. Topologically the bundle may be identified, in the \(U\) direction, with the pullback of its restriction over one point. Equivalently, one may use the integral Thom isomorphism for its complex orientation. It follows that the compact-support cohomology sheaves of each covered stratum are locally constant finitely generated abelian groups on \(U\). Localization triangles pass this conclusion through the finite stratification: kernels, cokernels, and extensions of locally constant sheaves are locally constant. The auxiliary affine-bundle trace removes its shift. Write \(f\) for the covered smooth family of relative dimension \(\delta\). The complex \(K=Rf_!\mathbb Z\) is locally perfect: its cohomology is bounded and finitely generated, and \(\mathbb Z\) has finite global dimension. Smooth Verdier duality gives \[Rf_*\mathbb Z\simeq R\mathcal Hom(K,\mathbb Z_V)[-2\delta].\] The right side is locally constant and perfect, so taking its stalk commutes with this duality. Compact-support base change and the fiberwise cup–trace pairing identify its stalk with \(R\Gamma(f^{-1}(t),\mathbb Z)\). This identification is precisely the natural ordinary base-change morphism: both are adjoint to the cup product followed by the smooth orientation trace, whose formation commutes with compact-support base change. This proves the ordinary assertion, without using a nonproper smooth base-change principle. Finally, write \(p:Y^{\mathrm B}\times D_1\to Y^{\mathrm B}\) for the projection and \(s\) for its section at the identity of \(D_1\). For ordinary direct images, \(s^*p^*=\mathrm{id}\) gives the required summand. For compact supports use the Gysin map of the closed section, followed by integration over \(D_1\): these maps have degrees \(4g\) and \(-4g\) and compose to the identity. Equivalently, the integral compact-support Künneth complex of \(D_1\) has its top class as a split summand. Thus both local-constancy assertions pass to \(Y^{\mathrm B}\), and natural ordinary base change passes through the first splitting. The ordinary splitting is algebraic on each fiber, so it also proves the asserted Hodge–Tate property for \(Y^{\mathrm B}\). ◻ The scalar summand and the determinant factorWe have now obtained Lefschetz on a regular-semisimple fiber of the cover and cohomological local constancy over the entire ordered base. We next pass to \(q\) and then remove the flag and determinant factors. For a smooth algebraic family whose ordinary direct images are lisse (that is, have locally constant cohomology sheaves) and satisfy fiberwise base change, mixed Hodge module direct image gives admissible graded-polarizable variations of mixed Hodge structure on these local systems. In particular, parallel transport preserves the weight filtration; cup products are parallel as well. The construction and its diagram version are given in Proposition 10. Apply this fact to the family in Lemma 9. Along a path in the connected space \(V\), transport a Lefschetz class from a distinct-eigenvalue fiber to \(q\). We obtain \[\omega\in\operatorname{Gr}^W_4 H^2(\widehat Y^{\mathrm B}_q,\mathbb C)\] with Lefschetz center \(R+b+g\). A choice of path suffices; no assertion that this class is invariant under all monodromy is needed. Take the product of the correspondence in Lemma 8 with \(D_1\), writing \(\widehat X^{\mathrm B}=X^{\mathrm B}\times D_1\) and \(\widehat Z^{\mathrm B}=Z^{\mathrm B}\times D_1\). The flag bundle has rational algebraic Leray–Hirsch classes. More explicitly, the ratios of the ordered graded lines descend for the universal projective bundle, and their first Chern classes restrict to generators of the flag cohomology over \(\mathbb Q\). Indeed, differences of Chern roots generate rationally because the sum of the roots vanishes on the flag fiber. Polynomial representatives of a fiber basis therefore give the required global classes. The additional degree-two classes have weight two. Consequently \[\pi^*:\operatorname{Gr}^W_4H^2(\widehat X^{\mathrm B},\mathbb C) \xrightarrow{\ \sim\ } \operatorname{Gr}^W_4H^2(\widehat Z^{\mathrm B},\mathbb C).\] There is a unique class \(\xi\) in the space on the left such that \(\iota^*\omega=\pi^*\xi\) on the weight-graded. By the projection formula, \(\mathsf A\) and \(\mathsf B\) intertwine multiplication by \(\omega\) and \(\xi\) on weight-gradeds. Their actual weight shifts are \(-2b\) and \(2b\). Equation (11) exhibits the image of \(\mathsf B\) as a graded stable summand, with stable complement \(\ker\mathsf A\). Each Lefschetz isomorphism for \(\omega\) is block diagonal for this decomposition and thus restricts to an isomorphism on the summand. The half-weight shift of \(\mathsf B\) is \(b\), so \(\xi\) has center \(R+g\) on \(H^*(\widehat X^{\mathrm B},\mathbb C)\). This correspondence also makes its cohomology a summand of a Tate twist of the Hodge–Tate cohomology upstairs, hence Hodge–Tate. It remains to remove \(D_1\). By Lemma 3 and the given nonabelian-Hodge diffeomorphism, \(H^0(X^{\mathrm B})=\mathbb Q\) and \(H^1(X^{\mathrm B})=0\). Künneth therefore gives \[\xi=\xi_X+\xi_D, \qquad \xi_X\in\operatorname{Gr}^W_4H^2(X^{\mathrm B},\mathbb C), \quad \xi_D\in H^2(D_1,\mathbb C).\] The tensor-factor Lefschetz lemma, Lemma 6, shows that each factor has a common Lefschetz center and that the two centers add to \(R+g\). The cohomology of \(D_1\) is an exterior algebra on \(2g\) generators of cohomological degree one and weight two. Its smallest and largest half-weight grades are \(0\) and \(2g\), so its center is \(g\). Thus \(\xi_X\) has center \(R\). Projection and a section also show that \(X^{\mathrm B}\) itself has Hodge–Tate cohomology. Since \(H^0(X^{\mathrm B})\ne0\) and \(R>0\), this Lefschetz operator \(\xi_X\) is nonzero. Lemma 3 gives \(H^2(X^{\mathrm B},\mathbb Q)=\mathbb Q e\) as a vector space, so the image of \(e\) in \(\operatorname{Gr}^W_4\) is nonzero and is a nonzero scalar multiple of \(\xi_X\). Here \(e\in W_4H^2\) because \(X^{\mathrm B}\) is smooth. Rescaling a Lefschetz operator preserves all its isomorphisms. They hold over \(\mathbb Q\), since the rational maps in question become isomorphisms over \(\mathbb C\). This proves Theorem 7. No step took invariants under the finite group \(\Gamma\). Weights for flat bundles of algebraic familiesConsider first a product \(S\times X^{\mathrm B}\), with \(S\) a closed oriented smooth surface. The moving-point construction in the proof overview requires integration over \(S\) to lower cohomological degree by two while preserving weights. On this product, give the Künneth factor \(H^a(S,\mathbb Q)\) pure weight zero and Hodge type \((0,0)\) in every degree, and retain Deligne’s mixed Hodge structure on \(H^*(X^{\mathrm B},\mathbb Q)\). Integration over \(S\) then acts on the first factor without a Tate twist. Even when \(S\) is an algebraic curve, this convention differs from its ordinary Deligne weights. The moving-puncture flag spaces need not be products. We therefore extend this convention to bundles whose transition maps are locally constant algebraic automorphisms of a fiber family. A finite diagram of algebraic fibers will give the mixed Hodge structures together with their compatibility with parallel transport and proper Gysin maps. Section 5 will construct the required bundles and identify the scalar unflagged bundle as an actual flat product. The simplicial mixed-Hodge formalism goes back to Deligne (Deligne 1974, sec. 8.3); Shende uses weight-zero simplicial cochains to compute weights of tautological classes on character varieties (Shende 2017, proof of the main Theorem). Here we supply the relative construction and the Gysin compatibility needed for the moving-point correspondence. The finite diagramLet \(V\) be a smooth connected complex algebraic variety and let \(p:H\to V\) be an algebraic morphism of finite type. We assume that \(Rp_*\mathbb Z_H\) has bounded, locally constant, finitely generated cohomology sheaves and that its natural ordinary base-change maps \[ i_t^*Rp_*\mathbb Z_H\longrightarrow R\Gamma(H_t,\mathbb Z) \tag{13}\] are isomorphisms for all \(t\in V\), where \(i_t:\{t\}\hookrightarrow V\). These are hypotheses about ordinary direct image; smoothness alone would not imply them for a nonproper morphism. Let \(S\) be a compact smooth manifold. A flat bundle of the family \(H\to V\) over \(S\) means a space \(\mathscr H\) with a map to \(S\times V\) and local identifications \[\mathscr H|_{U_i\times V}\simeq U_i\times H\] whose transition maps have the form \((s,h)\mapsto(s,g_{ij}(h))\), with \(g_{ij}\) an algebraic automorphism over \(V\), locally constant in \(s\). The maps \(g_{ij}\) satisfy the cocycle identity. Write \(\mathscr H_t\) for the total space over \(S\) at \(t\in V\). Thus \(\mathscr H_t\) includes the parameter space \(S\); it need not be an algebraic variety. A map of flat bundles will mean one which, in simultaneous flat trivializations, is the identity on \(S\) times an algebraic map of the fiber families. Choose a finite good cover \(\mathcal U=\{U_i\}\) refining a flat trivializing cover. Every nonempty intersection \(U_I=\bigcap_{i\in I}U_i\) is contractible. Choose a trivialization on each \(U_I\). Inclusion of intersections then gives a finite diagram of copies \(p_I:H_I\to V\) and algebraic isomorphisms over \(V\). The cocycle identity makes this a diagram of maps of varieties, before passing to cohomology. Its index category is the poset of nonempty intersections, ordered in the direction of cohomological restriction. We use the enhanced bounded derived category of mixed Hodge modules, whose six operations and rational realization are compatible with diagrams (Tubach 2025, sec. 2.1, Theorem 2.1.1, Remark 2.1.2, and Proposition 4.2.6). For an algebraic variety \(T\), let \(\mathbb Q_T^H\) denote the constant mixed-Hodge-module complex with underlying complex \(\mathbb Q_T\), without a dimension shift. Define \[ K_{\mathscr H} =\mathop{\mathrm{holim}}_I Rp_{I*}\mathbb Q_{H_I}^H \quad\text{in }D^b\mathrm{MHM}(V). \tag{14}\] Here the homotopy limit means the derived limit, retaining the transition maps and their compatibilities. The index poset has a finite-dimensional nerve, so this is a finite limit and remains bounded. In particular, (14) uses the full derived diagram, not only the cohomology groups of its terms. Proposition 10 (Diagram weights). Under the preceding hypotheses, \(H^j(\mathscr H_t,\mathbb Q)\) carries a graded-polarizable mixed Hodge structure, functorial for maps of flat bundles that are algebraic in flat trivializations. As \(t\) varies, these structures form an admissible graded-polarizable variation of mixed Hodge structures, with an integral underlying local system up to torsion. They are computed by \(H^j(i_t^*K_{\mathscr H})\). If \(H^j(H_t,\mathbb Q)\) is Hodge–Tate for every \(j\) and \(t\), then \(H^j(\mathscr H_t,\mathbb Q)\) is Hodge–Tate as well. We call its weight filtration the diagram weight filtration. Proof. First we identify the underlying ordinary complex. Open-cover descent computes the ordinary direct image of \(\mathscr H\to V\) from the spaces \(U_I\times H_I\). Projection to \(H_I\) induces a quasi-isomorphism on direct images over \(V\): over any open subset of \(V\), its fiber in this product is the contractible space \(U_I\). These projections commute with the transition maps. Their derived limit therefore identifies the rational realization of \(K_{\mathscr H}\) with the ordinary direct image of \(\mathscr H\to V\). The same argument works with integral coefficients. A finite limit of bounded complexes with locally constant cohomology again has locally constant cohomology. Its integral cohomology sheaves have finite type. Point pullback commutes with finite limits, and the termwise base-change maps are isomorphisms by (13). The corresponding maps in mixed Hodge modules are isomorphisms because rational realization is conservative. It follows that \(i_t^*K_{\mathscr H}\) computes the derived diagram of the algebraic fibers \(H_{I,t}\) and that its underlying cohomology is \(H^*(\mathscr H_t,\mathbb Q)\). Put \(v=\dim V\). Since the ordinary cohomology sheaves of \(K_{\mathscr H}\) are locally constant, its perverse cohomology \({}^pH^{j+v}(K_{\mathscr H})\) is a smooth mixed Hodge module. Smooth mixed Hodge modules, after the dimension shift, are admissible graded-polarizable variations (Saito 1990, sec. 3.2, Equation (3.2.1)). Applying point pullback to the perverse truncations shows that the fiber of this variation is \(H^j(i_t^*K_{\mathscr H})\): a smooth perverse object has only one nonzero fiber degree, namely \(-v\). Finally, mixed Hodge structures whose weight gradeds have only Hodge types \((r,r)\) are closed under subobjects, quotients, and extensions. The long exact sequence of a cone thus shows that complexes with Hodge–Tate cohomology are closed under finite limits. Applying this observation to the fiber diagram proves the last assertion. Algebraic maps of the diagrams give the stated functoriality. A common good refinement compares different choices of cover and trivializations: its comparison maps are isomorphisms after ordinary descent, hence also in mixed Hodge modules by conservativity. ◻ The construction also preserves the cup product. Each algebraic direct image of the constant complex has its functorial cup product, and the transition pullbacks preserve it. The derived limit inherits this product. Under the open-cover comparison in the proof of Proposition 10, it is the ordinary cup product on \(H^*(\mathscr H_t,\mathbb Q)\). Thus parallel transport in \(V\) preserves both the cohomology ring and its weight filtration. Products and proper Gysin mapsWe next identify the maps that preserve these weights. Proposition 11 (Weight shifts). The diagram weight filtrations have the following properties.
Proof. For a product, the diagram is constant. Its derived limit is \[C^*(N\mathcal U,\mathbb Q(0))\otimes R\Gamma(M,\mathbb Q_M^H),\] where \(N\mathcal U\) is the finite nerve of the good cover. The first complex has a copy of \(\mathbb Q(0)\) for each simplex, with its ordinary simplicial differential. All its cohomology therefore has weight zero. The external-product comparison on the cover gives exactly the ordinary Künneth map. Evaluation on a simplicial fundamental cycle defines \[C^*(N\mathcal U,\mathbb Q(0))\longrightarrow \mathbb Q(0)[-d_S].\] This is a morphism of complexes of mixed Hodge structures and realizes ordinary integration over \(S\). It has no Tate twist. Projection pullback is induced by the unit of the same cochain complex. This proves the first assertion; functoriality of algebraic pullbacks proves the second. For the third assertion, fix \(t\) and choose simultaneous trivializations of the map. On each algebraic fiber map \(u_{I,t}:H_{I,t}\to H'_{I,t}\), smooth dualizing complexes and the proper counit give the Gysin morphism \[ Ru_{I,t*}\mathbb Q^H_{H_{I,t}}\longrightarrow \mathbb Q^H_{H'_{I,t}}[2c](c). \tag{15}\] Its degree and Tate twist give the displayed weight shift. Complex orientations are preserved by the algebraic transition isomorphisms, and the proper counit is natural. Consequently (15) gives a coherent map of the finite diagrams and hence of their derived limits. It remains to identify its ordinary realization. On \(U_I\times H_{I,t}\) the map is the identity on \(U_I\) times \(u_{I,t}\). The orientation trace for this product is the fiber trace, tensored with the identity on \(U_I\). It is compatible with restriction to intersections and with the transition isomorphisms. Open-cover descent therefore identifies the realized map with the ordinary topological Gysin map of the total spaces. In particular, the construction gives the actual Gysin map, not merely a map with the same source and target. ◻ Finite monodromy on weight gradedsThe diagram construction has now supplied a variation on the cohomology of the total spaces. Hodge–Tate fibers and the integral structure put a strong restriction on its monodromy. Lemma 12. Assume the Hodge–Tate hypothesis of Proposition 10. The combined monodromy action on all \(\operatorname{Gr}^W_aH^j(\mathscr H_t,\mathbb Q)\) has finite image. For any loop with cohomology monodromy \(T\), there is an integer \(M>0\) such that \(T^M\) is unipotent and \[ N=\frac{1}{M}\log(T^M) \quad\text{satisfies}\quad N(W_a)\subset W_{a-2}. \tag{16}\] The logarithm is a finite polynomial. On the total cohomology ring, \(N\) is a derivation of cohomological degree zero. Proof. Each nonzero weight graded is a polarizable variation of pure type \((r,r)\) and weight \(2r\). After the conventional sign, its flat polarization is positive definite on the underlying real vector space. Let \(\mathcal L\) be the torsion-free quotient of the integral cohomology local system. Intersecting \(\mathcal L\) with the rational weight sub-local systems and taking successive quotients gives an invariant full lattice in each rational graded piece. These intersections are saturated because the subspaces are rational. The automorphisms of a lattice preserving a positive definite form constitute a finite group: in a fixed lattice basis, every column of such an automorphism has a prescribed bounded norm and hence lies in a finite set. Thus each graded monodromy image is finite. Only finitely many cohomological degrees and weights occur, which proves the combined assertion. Choose \(M\) killing the action of the specified loop on all weight gradeds. Then \[(T^M-1)W_a\subset W_{a-1}=W_{a-2}\] whenever \(a\) is even; the identical conclusion for odd \(a\) follows because successive odd and even steps coincide. The operator \(T^M-1\) is nilpotent, since the weight filtration is finite. Its finite logarithm has the same lowering bound. Parallel transport preserves cup products. For every integer \(k\geq0\), the polynomial operator \(\exp(kMN)=T^{Mk}\) is therefore a ring automorphism. For cohomology classes \(\alpha,\beta\), the identity \[\exp(kMN)(\alpha\beta) =\exp(kMN)(\alpha)\exp(kMN)(\beta)\] is an equality of polynomials in \(k\). Comparing linear coefficients proves \(N(\alpha\beta)=N(\alpha)\beta+\alpha N(\beta)\). Monodromy preserves cohomological degree, so \(N\) does as well. ◻ To apply these results, we will verify locally constant algebraic transition maps for the family with a moving marked point, together with simultaneous such transitions for its flag correspondence. We will also identify the scalar unflagged bundle as a flat product. Once those inputs are established, Proposition 11 controls its push-pull maps, and Lemma 12 supplies the weight-lowering logarithm on the same ordinary cohomology groups. Moving logarithmic poles and cohomology comparisonsWe now construct a single family through which the Higgs and Betti correspondences can be compared. The point carrying the full flag must move over a compact curve. Its motion changes the determinant, so the first step is to compensate for that change by a line bundle. The resulting comparison will apply to the whole fixed-determinant cohomology. The determinant correction and the scalar correspondenceChoose a point \(x_0\in C\). For the construction we first take \(L=\mathcal O_C(d x_0)\); we return to an arbitrary determinant at the end of this section. The line bundle \(\mathcal O_C(d x)\) has a canonical logarithmic connection \(d_{d x}\): its canonical meromorphic section is horizontal. Its residue at \(x\) is \(-d\). Multiplying a connection by \(\lambda\) produces a \(\lambda\)-connection, whose Leibniz rule is \(D(fs)=\lambda\,df\otimes s+fD(s)\). Pull back the finite étale map \([n]:\operatorname{Pic}^0(C)\to\operatorname{Pic}^0(C)\) by \[C\longrightarrow\operatorname{Pic}^0(C),\qquad x\longmapsto\mathcal O_C(d x-d x_0),\] and choose a connected component \(S\) of this pullback. Then \(S\) is a smooth projective connected curve, and its map \(x:S\to C\) is finite étale and surjective. Write \(\Delta\subset C\times S\) for the graph of \(x\). A Poincaré bundle gives a line bundle \(J\) on \(C\times S\) such that \[ J^{\otimes n}\simeq \mathcal O_{C\times S}\bigl(d\Delta-d(x_0\times S)\bigr) \otimes\operatorname{pr}_S^*B \tag{17}\] for some line bundle \(B\) on \(S\). The possible base factor is the only ambiguity in this equality of families. A line pulled back from \(S\) has a canonical relative connection along \(C\). Equip the right side of (17) with the relative logarithmic connection given by its canonical meromorphic section and this connection on the base factor. Dividing its local connection forms by \(n\) defines a unique compatible connection on \(J\). This division glues: the transition equation for \(J^{\otimes n}\) is \(n\) times the equation for \(J\). Let \(D_{J,\lambda}\) be the resulting relative \(\lambda\)-connection. Its residues are \(-\lambda d/n\) along \(\Delta\) and \(+\lambda d/n\) along \(x_0\times S\). Put \[\mathfrak t_0=\{(u_1,\ldots,u_n)\in\mathbb A^n: \textstyle\sum_i u_i=0\},\qquad \Lambda=\mathbb A^1_\lambda\times\mathfrak t_0.\] Let \(\mathcal X\to\mathbb A^1_\lambda\) parametrize stable logarithmic \(\lambda\)-connections on rank-\(n\) bundles, with determinant \((\mathcal O_C(d x_0),\lambda d_{d x_0})\) and residue \(-\lambda(d/n)I\) at \(x_0\). Stability here and below is slope stability for subbundles preserved by the operator. At \(\lambda=0\) the scalar residue is zero, so the fiber \(X_0\) is the ordinary trace-free Higgs moduli space \(X\). Let \(\mathcal Y\to S\times\Lambda\) parametrize the following data:
The flag does not enter the stability condition. We write \(Y_{\lambda,u}\) for the fiber over \((\lambda,u)\in\Lambda\), retaining all of \(S\). Thus \(Y_{\lambda,u}\) is itself a family over the moving-point curve. At \(u=0\), let \(\mathcal Z\) be the closed locus where the residue is scalar, and let \(\mathcal O\) be the same scalar-residue family with the flag forgotten. The correspondence over \(\mathbb A^1_\lambda\) is shown fiberwise in Figure 1. Here \(\pi\) forgets the flag and \(\iota\) is the scalar-residue inclusion. The first map comes from the following product identification. Lemma 13. Tensoring by \((J,D_{J,\lambda})\) gives an algebraic isomorphism \(\mathcal O\simeq S\times\mathcal X\) over \(S\times\mathbb A^1\). At \(\lambda=0\) it preserves the ordinary Hitchin coefficients. Proof. By (17), tensoring fixed-pole data by \(J\) changes its determinant to \(\mathcal O_C(d x(s))\), up to a base line, and changes its determinant operator to the prescribed one. At \(x_0\), the residue \(+\lambda d/n\) of \(J\) cancels the residue \(-\lambda d/n\) of the original rank-\(n\) connection. This cancellation also holds where the moving and fixed sections meet. In a coordinate \(z\) with moving section \(z=a(s)\), the scalar polar part contributed by \(J\) is \[-\frac{\lambda d}{n}\frac{dz}{z-a(s)} +\frac{\lambda d}{n}\frac{dz}{z}.\] Adding the fixed-pole form leaves only the first term. The identity is an identity of relative meromorphic forms over the whole local base, including \(a(s)=0\). Thus the tensor product has a single logarithmic pole at the moving point. The inverse construction tensors by \(J^{-1}\). Base-line twists do not change the induced map to coarse moduli, and \(\deg J_s=0\) preserves stability. When \(\lambda=0\), the Higgs field of \(J\) is zero, so the characteristic polynomial is unchanged. ◻ The relative quasiprojective moduli of logarithmic \(\lambda\)-connections exist by the standard construction; we use the formulation in (Cataldo and Fernandez Herrero 2024, sec. 2.2). Fixed determinant is obtained by taking the inverse image of its rank-one section. Adding a residue-invariant full flag is projective over the unflagged moduli; its ordered residue eigenvalues are then regular functions on the flag parameter space. The prescribed-residue equations are closed. We will use universal bundles only étale locally. Coprimality makes semistable pairs stable, with scalar automorphisms. Their stack is a scalar gerbe over its coarse space, or a \(\mu_n\)-gerbe after choosing a determinant isomorphism; compare (Cataldo and Fernandez Herrero 2024, Lemma 5.3 and Remark 5.4). The universal projective bundle, \(\operatorname{End}E\), and the line ratios \(Q_i\otimes Q_j^{-1}\) have trivial scalar action and descend. Individual \(Q_i\) need not descend, and no construction below requires them to do so. Smooth families and actual restriction isomorphismsOur next objective is to identify the cohomology of all fibers by restriction from the total space. Smoothness alone would not suffice, because these moduli spaces are not proper. The scaling action supplies the additional compactness property that is needed. Proposition 14. The morphism \(\mathcal Y\to S\times\Lambda\) is smooth of relative dimension \(2R+2b\), and \(\mathcal X\to\mathbb A^1\) is smooth of relative dimension \(2R\). Their total spaces are semiprojective for scaling the operators, which scales \(\lambda\) and every \(u_i\) with weight one. The same holds for the inverse image in \(\mathcal Y\) of every linear subspace of \(\Lambda\) through zero. In Figure 1, \(\pi\) is a smooth proper flag projection of relative dimension \(b\), and \(\iota\) is a regular embedding of codimension \(b\) with normal bundle \(T_\pi^*\). Proof. We first establish zero limits for scaling. Given an unflagged object, keep its bundle fixed and scale its operator. This extends the orbit to the stack of all logarithmic \(\lambda\)-connections, without imposing semistability on the special fiber. Semistable reduction (Fernandez Herrero and Zhang 2025, Proposition 4.48) replaces this DVR family by a semistable one after a finite extension, without changing its generic fiber. Its hypotheses hold for \(\mathrm{GL}_n\) over \(\mathbb C\). The determinant of the replacement and the prescribed determinant agree generically, hence agree over the DVR by separatedness of the rank-one moduli space. A generic flag extends because the flag variety of the extended bundle at the pole is proper. Residue preservation and the ordered diagonal residue equations are closed, and therefore persist at the special fiber. Coprimality makes the limiting semistable pair stable. The same reasoning applies to the scalar-residue condition. A finite extension of the DVR is enough for a limit in the original coarse space. Indeed, embed this quasiprojective space in projective space as a locally closed subvariety. The original orbit has a unique projective limit. The limit after finite base change is that point and belongs to the coarse moduli space, so the original orbit extends there. This proves the required zero-limit property. We next check smoothness over \(\lambda=u=0\). At such a point put \[\mathcal F=\operatorname{ParEnd}_0(E),\qquad \mathcal G=\mathcal F^\vee\otimes K_C,\] where \(\mathcal F\) is the sheaf of trace-free endomorphisms preserving the flag at \(x(s)\). Trace pairing identifies \(\mathcal G\) with the trace-free logarithmic Higgs fields having strictly flag-lowering residue. The relative deformation complex is \[ \mathcal F\xrightarrow{[\theta,-]}\mathcal G. \tag{18}\] Here is the lifting argument, including the parameter directions. For a small Artin extension with prescribed lifts of \(s,\lambda,u\), the bundle, determinant isomorphism and flag lift because the obstruction lies in \(H^2(C,\mathcal F)=0\). In local frames respecting the lifted flag, the operator lifts with its prescribed determinant and diagonal residues: these are affine-linear conditions, and trace splits in characteristic zero. Its gluing obstruction lies in \(H^1(C,\mathcal G)\) tensored with the square-zero ideal. Changing the bundle and flag gluing changes this obstruction by the image of \(H^1(C,\mathcal F)\) under (18). This map on \(H^1\) is surjective. Its Serre dual is, up to sign, the map on \(H^0\) in (18); its kernel consists of trace-free automorphisms of the stable Higgs pair preserving the flag, hence is zero. Thus every such lifting problem has a solution. Since \[\chi(\mathcal F)=-(n^2-1)(g-1)-b=-R-b,\] the relative tangent dimension is \(-2\chi(\mathcal F)=2R+2b\). For the scalar unflagged family, replace \(\mathcal F\) by \(\operatorname{End}_0(E)\) and obtain dimension \(2R\) in the same way. Finite scalar stabilizers act trivially on these deformations, so the calculation also proves smoothness of the coarse spaces. The nonsmooth locus of the morphism is closed and scaling invariant. If it contained a point, it would contain that point’s zero limit, contradicting the calculation over \(\lambda=u=0\). This proves smoothness everywhere. A scaling-fixed point has \(\lambda=u=0\). Its logarithmic Hitchin coefficients vanish, because their scaling weights are positive. The logarithmic Hitchin map is proper; its base has coefficients in \(H^0(C,K_C(x(s))^{\otimes i})\) as in (Cataldo and Fernandez Herrero 2024, sec. 2.4, Equation (4)). The fixed locus is closed in its nilpotent fiber after adding flags and imposing determinant and residue conditions. Since flags and \(S\) are proper, that fixed locus is proper. Together with the zero limits, this proves semiprojectivity. The inverse image of a linear subspace through zero is smooth by base change and inherits both properties. Finally \(\pi\) is the full flag bundle of the universal projective bundle. On the \(u=0\) family, subtracting the prescribed scalar from the residue gives a section of the bundle of strictly flag-lowering matrices. Its zero scheme is \(\mathcal Z\). The smoothness and dimensions just proved show that it is a regular zero scheme of codimension \(b\). Trace pairing identifies this residue bundle along \(\mathcal Z\) with the cotangent bundle of the flag fibers, giving \(N_\iota\simeq T_\pi^*\). ◻ Corollary 15. For every \((\lambda,u)\in\Lambda\), restriction induces an isomorphism \[ \rho_{\lambda,u}:H^*(\mathcal Y,\mathbb Q) \xrightarrow{\ \sim\ }H^*(Y_{\lambda,u},\mathbb Q). \tag{19}\] Restriction to the inverse image of any line through zero in \(\Lambda\) is also an isomorphism, as is restriction from that inverse image to any of its fibers. The analogous restriction isomorphisms hold for all four families in Figure 1 over the \(\lambda\)-line. They commute with pullbacks and with the proper Gysin maps in that correspondence, including integration in the \(S\) factor. Proof. Recall that the core of a smooth semiprojective variety is the union of the sets whose scaling orbits have limits as the parameter tends to infinity. Its inclusion induces a cohomology isomorphism (Hausel and Rodriguez-Villegas 2015, Theorem 1.3.1). Because every coordinate on \(\Lambda\) has positive weight, a point of \(\mathcal Y\) with such a limit must lie over zero. Hence \(\mathcal Y\) and its inverse image \(\mathcal Y_\ell\) of any line \(\ell\) through zero have the same core. Their restrictions to the core commute, so \(H^*(\mathcal Y)\to H^*(\mathcal Y_\ell)\) is an isomorphism. The map \(\mathcal Y_\ell\to\ell\) is smooth and surjective. For surjectivity, its image is a scaling-invariant open subset containing zero, and therefore contains the whole affine line. Apply (Hausel and Rodriguez-Villegas 2015, Corollary 1.3.3): for a smooth surjection from a smooth semiprojective variety to the affine line, equivariant for a positive base weight, restriction to each fiber is an isomorphism. This proves (19) and its line version. The same proof applies to \(\mathcal X\), \(\mathcal O\) and \(\mathcal Z\). Pullback compatibility is functorial. For Gysin maps, the families are smooth over the line, the scalar embedding is transverse to fiber restriction, and the flag and product projections are smooth proper. The transverse base-change identities for Gysin maps give the claimed compatibilities. ◻ Riemann–Hilbert with a moving punctureLet \(V\), \(q\) and \(Y^{\rm B}\to V\) be the ordered eigenvalue family from Section 3. The exponent domain we need is \[ U=\left\{u\in\mathfrak t_0^{\rm an}: t(u)=\bigl(\zeta e^{-2\pi\sqrt{-1}u_i}\bigr)_i\in V,\quad u_i-u_j\notin\mathbb Z\setminus\{0\}\right\}. \tag{20}\] Notice that zero differences are allowed. In particular \(0\in U\), which is essential for the scalar correspondence. There is a flat bundle over \(S\) with algebraic fiber family \(Y^{\rm B}\to V\). To define it, use local trivializations of the punctured surfaces \(C\setminus\{x(s)\}\) and record a full flag of local subsystems near the puncture. We choose the peripheral-loop convention in which its monodromy is the product of commutators used to define \(Y^{\rm B}\). Changes of surface markings act on the handle matrices by group words and on the peripheral flag by the corresponding conjugating word. They are algebraic maps over \(V\). These transition maps are locally constant and satisfy the cocycle condition as algebraic maps on the coarse spaces. To check this precisely, let \(\delta\) be the product of commutators in the free fundamental group of the punctured surface. A change of marking gives an outer automorphism represented by \(\varphi\), with \(\varphi(\delta)=w\delta w^{-1}\). Word evaluation transforms a representation to \(\rho\varphi\) and its flag by \(\rho(w)\). Changing \(\varphi\) by an inner automorphism gives simultaneous conjugation. Changing \(w\) multiplies it on the right by an element centralizing \(\delta\). The cyclically reduced word \(\delta\) is not a proper power: each positive handle generator occurs just once. Its centralizer in the free group is therefore \(\langle\delta\rangle\). Thus this last ambiguity is a power of peripheral monodromy and preserves every invariant flag, including those with repeated eigenvalues or nonsemisimple monodromy. The resulting maps compose strictly after passage to the geometric quotient. Consequently no choice of eigenlines or higher homotopy of transitions is needed. The scalar flag correspondence from Section 3 gives a corresponding diagram of flat bundles over \(S\). Proposition 16. Over \(U\), Riemann–Hilbert identifies \(Y_{1,u}\) with the total space over \(S\) of this flat bundle at parameter \(t(u)\). These identifications are homeomorphisms of families. At \(u=0\) they identify the scalar correspondence of Figure 1 at \(\lambda=1\) with the flat Betti scalar correspondence, compatibly with its pullbacks and Gysin maps. Proof. The local exponents of a connection are \(r_i=-d/n+u_i\). For the regular-singular correspondence and logarithmic lattices, including Manin’s extension theorem and Katz’s nonresonance corollary, see Deligne (Deligne 1970, II, Proposition 5.4, Remark 5.5(ii), Corollary 5.6, and Theorem 5.9). We spell out the nonresonant local construction to track the ordered flags and dependence on the moving parameters. In a disc coordinate \(z\), write a logarithmic connection as \(d+A(z)\,dz/z\), with \(A(0)=A_0\). The regular-singular reduction to \(d+A_0\,dz/z\) by a gauge equal to the identity at zero is obtained recursively using the operators \(k+\operatorname{ad}(A_0)\), \(k\geq1\). Their eigenvalues are \(k+r_i-r_j\), so they are invertible under (20), even when \(A_0\) has repeated eigenvalues or a nonzero nilpotent part. On a small parameter neighborhood their inverse norms are \(O(1/k)\) for large \(k\). The usual power-series majorant for the analytic coefficients therefore gives convergence on a common smaller disc and continuous dependence on parameters. In this constant-residue model a residue-invariant flag gives a monodromy-invariant flag. Conversely, the prescribed exponents select one logarithm for each monodromy eigenvalue: equal exponential values have equal selected exponents, by (20). Functional calculus on each generalized eigenspace then gives a logarithm of monodromy preserving its invariant flag. This constructs the inverse logarithmic extension with the specified ordered residues. Coordinate and logarithm changes in the constant-residue model act by functions of the residue, and hence preserve the flag; the construction is intrinsic. In rank one the same construction gives exactly \((\mathcal O_C(d x(s)),d_{d x(s)})\), so the determinant is the required one. The subproduct condition defining \(V\) makes the representation irreducible, and thus ensures stability. Holonomy along local moving generators, together with this local normal form, makes the forward maps continuous in the bundle and in \(s,u\). Regard the Betti family as pulled back to \(U\) via \(t\); there is no assertion that \(t\) is globally injective. The forward map is a continuous bijection between manifolds of equal real dimension, by Proposition 14 and the Betti smoothness. Invariance of domain gives its inverse continuity. For a fixed point of \(S\) it is holomorphic on the moduli fibers, so it preserves their complex orientations. At \(u=0\), scalar residues correspond to scalar monodromy, and forgetting or retaining the flag commutes with this construction. The proper maps in the correspondence have their usual complex orientations in the algebraic fibers and the same orientation on \(S\). Consequently their topological Gysin maps agree under these homeomorphisms. ◻ Lemma 17. The product identification in Lemma 13, at \(\lambda=1\), identifies the scalar unflagged Betti family with \(S\times X^{\rm B}\) as a flat bundle with algebraic fiber. Its projection to \(X^{\rm B}\) corresponds to \(\operatorname{pr}\). Proof. Away from the fixed and moving poles, the nth power of the connection on \(J\) is the canonically trivial connection. Its holonomies therefore lie in \(\mu_n\). Locally in \(S\), take a disc containing \(x_0\) and the moving point, and choose the handle generators outside that disc. Their line holonomies depend continuously on \(s\) and take values in the finite group \(\mu_n\), so are locally constant. Tensoring multiplies the handle matrices by these constant scalars, an algebraic map on the representation variety. The argument also applies in collision neighborhoods. Thus the algebraic product identification of the scalar connection family is compatible with the locally constant algebraic Betti transitions. ◻ We have now obtained the actual flat diagrams to which Section 4 will be applied. In particular, when that construction gives weight zero to the cochains of \(S\), its product and integration statements concern the same projection \(\operatorname{pr}\) as the logarithmic correspondence. The nonabelian-Hodge comparison on full cohomologyThe restriction isomorphisms for \(\mathcal X\) and Riemann–Hilbert give \[ H^*(X^{\rm B})\xrightarrow{\ \sim\ }H^*(X_1) \xleftarrow{\ \sim\ }H^*(\mathcal X) \xrightarrow{\ \sim\ }H^*(X). \tag{21}\] We must check that this comparison transports the weight filtration specified by nonabelian Hodge theory, including its nontrivial \(\Gamma\)-character summands. Agreement only after taking \(\Gamma\)-invariants would not suffice. Lemma 18. Let a finite group \(G\) act algebraically on a smooth connected complex variety \(B\), and let \(q:B\to B/G\) be the quotient. Suppose \(g:A\to B\) is a homeomorphism and \(f:A\to B\) is continuous with \(qf=qg\). Then \(f=\gamma g\) for a single \(\gamma\in G\). Proof. Divide out the kernel of the action. Smoothness and connectedness make \(B\) irreducible. Removing the fixed loci of the nonidentity elements gives a dense connected Zariski open \(B^\circ\) on which the action is free. For \(a\in g^{-1}(B^\circ)\) there is a unique \(\gamma(a)\) with \(f(a)=\gamma(a)g(a)\). The free finite quotient is a covering there, so \(\gamma(a)\) is locally constant. It is constant because this open set is connected. Continuity extends the equality over its closure, which is all of \(A\). ◻ Proposition 19. The comparison (21) transports the Deligne weight filtration on the whole \(H^*(X^{\rm B},\mathbb Q)\) in the same way as the nonabelian-Hodge identification. The conclusion is unchanged when \(\mathcal O_C(d x_0)\) is replaced by an arbitrary \(L\in\operatorname{Pic}^d(C)\) and the Higgs spaces are identified by tensoring with a degree-zero nth root of their determinant ratio. Proof. The full fixed-determinant nonabelian-Hodge diffeomorphism, including its \(\Gamma\)-equivariance, is part of the twisted construction in (Hausel and Thaddeus 2003, sec. 2 and 5). We compare its cohomology map with the particular logarithmic family above. For \((E,\theta)\in X\), choose a harmonic metric \(H\) normalized to a fixed metric on its determinant. Let \(\partial_H\) denote the \((1,0)\) part of its Chern connection. For real \(0\leq\tau\leq1\) consider the holomorphic structure and logarithmic \(\tau\)-operator \[ \bar\partial_E+\tau\theta^{\dagger_H},\qquad \tau\partial_H+\theta+ \frac{\tau}{n} \bigl(d^{1,0}_{d x_0}-\partial_{\det H}\bigr)I. \tag{22}\] Its projectivization is the usual harmonic preferred section (Simpson 1997, sec. 4). We verify the scalar adjustment. The trace of \(\theta\) and of \(\theta^{\dagger_H}\) is zero, so the determinant holomorphic structure stays fixed and the determinant operator is exactly \(\tau d_{d x_0}\). The trace-free holomorphicity equation follows from \(\bar\partial_E\theta=0\), \(\partial_H\theta^{\dagger_H}=0\) and the projective Hitchin equation. The scalar equation is that of the prescribed logarithmic determinant connection. The only nonregular term is the scalar logarithmic term at \(x_0\). For \(\tau\ne0\), divide the operator by \(\tau\). Its puncture monodromy is \(\zeta I\). A proper invariant subspace of rank \(r\) would have \(\zeta^r=1\) by taking determinants of the commutator relation, contrary to \(\gcd(n,d)=1\). Thus these connections are irreducible and stable. At \(\tau=0\) we recover the original Higgs pair. Hence (22) lies in \(\mathcal X\) throughout. This construction is a continuous homotopy of maps \(X\to\mathcal X\). One may work in local families of stable Higgs pairs. The normalized harmonic metrics vary smoothly: their trace-free metric linearization is self-adjoint elliptic, and its kernel consists of infinitesimal symmetries, which stability kills. This is also the parameter dependence used for preferred sections in (Simpson 1997, sec. 4). To pass to the analytic topology of coarse moduli, choose a sufficiently positive twist near any one parameter so the underlying bundles are generated and have vanishing \(H^1\). The kernels of the corresponding Dolbeault operators then give continuously varying bases of sections. Their evaluations give continuous quotient presentations; the logarithmic operators, viewed as morphisms from the first jet bundle with fixed symbol, also have continuous coefficients in such presentations. Passing to the stable quotient gives the asserted continuity, independently of the local choices. At \(\tau=0\) the homotopy is the inclusion \(X\hookrightarrow\mathcal X\). At \(\tau=1\) it factors through \(X_1\), and then through Riemann–Hilbert to a map \(F:X\to X^{\rm B}\). The pullback \(F^*\) is therefore precisely (21), because both restrictions from \(\mathcal X\) are isomorphisms. Projectivizing \(F\) gives the usual projective nonabelian-Hodge map. Let \(\Phi:X\to X^{\rm B}\) be the fixed-determinant nonabelian-Hodge diffeomorphism. The maps \(F\) and \(\Phi\) agree after projectivization. Two determinant-one lifts of the same projective representation differ on each handle generator by an nth root of unity; thus their classes differ by the finite group of determinant-preserving characters, identified with \(\Gamma\). The low-degree calculation of Section 2 gives \(H^0(X^{\rm B})=\mathbb Q\), so \(X^{\rm B}\) is connected; it is smooth in the coprime setting. Lemma 18 therefore gives \(F=\gamma\Phi\) for one \(\gamma\in\Gamma\). Its action on \(X^{\rm B}\) is algebraic and preserves Deligne weights. Consequently \(F^*\) and \(\Phi^*\) transport the weight filtration identically on every cohomology group. No averaging or projection to invariants occurs. Finally choose \(M\in\operatorname{Pic}^0(C)\) with \(M^{\otimes n}\simeq L\otimes\mathcal O_C(-d x_0)\). Tensoring by \(M\) identifies the two Higgs moduli spaces algebraically over the same Hitchin base. Their projective Higgs bundles, and therefore their projective harmonic correspondences, are unchanged. Applying the same finite-character argument to the two fixed-determinant nonabelian-Hodge maps shows that this identification also preserves the transported weight filtration. It preserves the perverse filtration because it is an isomorphism over the Hitchin base. ◻ A common cohomological operatorWe now use the logarithmic families to turn an elementary modification of Higgs bundles into monodromy of Betti spaces. All cohomology identifications in this section are the restriction maps of Corollary 15. This specifies a single operator before we estimate its effect on either filtration. Modification of two eigenlinesChoose \(v\in\sqrt{-1}\mathbb R^n\) with sum zero, distinct entries, and no vanishing proper nonempty partial sum. Such vectors exist because the excluded conditions form finitely many proper real hyperplanes. Set \[\ell=(1,-1,0,\ldots,0).\] At a logarithmic operator with distinct residue eigenvalues, a positive elementary modification allows a simple pole in a chosen residue eigenline; a negative one takes the kernel of the projection to that eigenline at \(x\). With the convention that a positive shift replaces a local generator \(s\) by \(z^{-1}s\), the \(\lambda\)-Leibniz rule changes its residue eigenvalue by \(-\lambda\). A negative shift changes it by \(+\lambda\). We perform the shifts specified by \(\ell\) successively: first the positive modification on the first labeled eigenline, then, after reselecting the labeled eigenspaces of the new residue, the negative modification on the second labeled eigenline. The ordered eigenspaces of the final residue define the final flag. Lemma 20. The two modifications define a continuous family of isomorphisms \[ F_a:Y_{a,v}\longrightarrow Y_{a,v-a\ell},\qquad 0\le a\le1. \tag{23}\] At \(a=0\) they define an algebraic automorphism of \(Y_{0,v}\). More generally, the same modification defines an automorphism over the punctured Higgs line \((\lambda,u)=(0,zv)\), \(z\ne0\), preserving the logarithmic Hitchin map. At \(a=1\), the Riemann–Hilbert identifications make \(F_1\) the identity on the underlying Betti space. Proof. For each single modification, choose a local frame adapted to its current residue eigenspaces. The off-diagonal coefficients involving the chosen eigenline vanish at the pole, so the singly modified lattice remains preserved by the logarithmic operator. The preceding calculation gives its new residue eigenvalues. Their imaginary parts remain distinct throughout (23), including after the first step. We can therefore reselect the residue eigenspaces before performing the second modification. The two-step composite preserves the determinant and its operator because the lattice shifts have sum zero. Its inverse performs the opposite single modifications in reverse order, again reselecting eigenspaces between steps. These elementary transformations and their inverses vary algebraically where the successive residue eigenvalues are distinct, giving the asserted continuous family. We check stability, which is not supplied by lattice modification alone. On the Higgs line with \(z\ne0\), a proper invariant saturated subbundle would have a trace Higgs differential with a single possible simple pole. Its residue would be \(z\sum_{i\in I}v_i\) for a proper nonempty subset \(I\). This is nonzero, contrary to the residue theorem. The modified Higgs bundles satisfy the same argument. Distinct residue eigenvalues split the local Higgs operator into formal eigenline summands; shifting these summands and shifting them back proves invertibility. For \(a>0\), divide the operator by \(a\). A proper invariant monodromy subspace would have determinant monodromy one around the puncture. The imaginary part of the sum of its exponents is \(a^{-1}\sum_{i\in I}\operatorname{Im}v_i\), which is nonzero. Thus no such subspace exists. Differences of exponents have nonzero imaginary part, so no nonzero integral resonance occurs. The inverse modifications are valid and remain stable by the same tests. The characteristic polynomial on the Higgs line is unchanged away from the pole and hence unchanged as a meromorphic polynomial on \(C\). Finally, modifications of a connection change only its logarithmic lattice at the puncture. At \(a=1\) the exponent changes are integers, so the meromorphic flat bundle and the ordered monodromy eigenlines are unchanged. This is precisely the endpoint identification asserted in the lemma. ◻ Translation as eigenvalue monodromyWrite \(T=F_0\) and transport its pullback to the total family: \[ \mathsf T=\rho_{0,v}^{-1}T^*\rho_{0,v} \quad\text{on }H^*(\mathcal Y,\mathbb Q). \tag{24}\] To compare this operator with the endpoint \(F_1\), we need constancy along the two families in (23). Their fibers are nonproper; the restriction isomorphisms, rather than properness, supply the following criterion. Lemma 21. Let \(I\) be a connected real interval and let \(p:M\to I\) and \(q:N\to I\) be smooth submersions, with finite-dimensional rational cohomology on their fibers. Suppose there are spaces \(A,B\) and continuous maps \(a:M\to A\), \(b:N\to B\) whose restrictions induce isomorphisms \[\alpha_t:H^*(A,\mathbb Q)\xrightarrow{\sim}H^*(M_t,\mathbb Q), \qquad \beta_t:H^*(B,\mathbb Q)\xrightarrow{\sim}H^*(N_t,\mathbb Q)\] for every \(t\in I\). If \(F:M\to N\) is continuous over \(I\), then \(\alpha_t^{-1}F_t^*\beta_t:H^*(B,\mathbb Q)\to H^*(A,\mathbb Q)\) is independent of \(t\). Proof. Fix a degree and a parameter \(t_0\). Choose finitely many compact singular cycles forming a rational homology basis of \(M_{t_0}\). A lift of the interval vector field near the compact union of their carriers has a flow for a common short time. It transports these cycles to nearby fibers; the resulting cycles sweep homologies in \(M\). Their images in \(A\) are therefore homologous, so their pairings with the restrictions of a fixed basis of \(H^*(A)\) are constant. The restriction isomorphisms show that the transported cycles remain a basis of the fiber homology. Applying the continuous map \(bF\) to these swept cycles gives homologies in \(B\). Hence their pairings with every fixed class of \(H^*(B)\) are also constant. These pairings are the matrix coefficients of \(\alpha_t^{-1}F_t^*\beta_t\), relative to the fixed bases. The operator is thus locally constant, including one-sided neighborhoods of interval endpoints, and therefore constant on \(I\). ◻ Apply the lemma with \(I=[0,1]\) and with \(M,N\) the pullbacks of \(\mathcal Y\to\Lambda\) along \[a\longmapsto(a,v),\qquad a\longmapsto(a,v-a\ell),\] respectively. These are smooth submersions by Proposition 14, and (23) gives the continuous map \(F:M\to N\). Take both ambient spaces in the lemma to be \(\mathcal Y\), with the natural maps from the two pullbacks. Their fiber restrictions induce the isomorphisms of Corollary 15. The constancy conclusion therefore gives \[ \mathsf T=\rho_{1,v}^{-1}F_1^*\rho_{1,v-\ell}. \tag{25}\] In particular, this identification does not require the nonproper smooth families to be globally locally trivial. Recall the eigenvalue map \[t(u)=(\zeta e^{-2\pi\sqrt{-1}u_i})_{i=1}^n.\] The path \(u=v-a\ell\), \(0\le a\le1\), maps to a loop in \(V\). Every forbidden proper subproduct has modulus different from one because the corresponding partial sum of \(v\) has nonzero imaginary part. The same condition excludes resonance along the entire path. By Proposition 16, this is a path in the actual moving-puncture Betti family. Restrictions of classes from \(\mathcal Y\) are flat sections along this path: the Betti direct images satisfy ordinary base change and are locally constant. Since \(F_1\) is the endpoint identity, (25) identifies \(\mathsf T\) with the pullback convention for its eigenvalue monodromy. Lemma 22. There is an integer \(M>0\) such that \[ N=\frac1M\log(\mathsf T^M) \tag{26}\] is a well-defined nilpotent derivation of \(H^*(\mathcal Y,\mathbb Q)\). Let \(N_{\lambda,u}=\rho_{\lambda,u}N\rho_{\lambda,u}^{-1}\). On \(H^*(Y_{1,0},\mathbb Q)\), equipped with the diagram weights of Section 4, one has \[N_{1,0}W_j\subset W_{j-2}.\] Proof. The full-flag Betti family has integral lisse direct images, ordinary base change, and Hodge–Tate fibers by Section 3. The moving-puncture transition maps are algebraic and locally constant by Proposition 16. The finite-monodromy statement of Section 4 therefore applies to this very family. Choose \(M\) that kills the monodromy action on every weight-graded piece of its total cohomology. There are finitely many such pieces. Then \(\mathsf T^M-1\) is nilpotent, and (26) is a finite logarithmic sum. The weights are even, so \(N\) lowers them by at least two at \((1,v)\). The path \((1,av)\), \(0\le a\le1\), stays in the nonresonant inverse image of \(V\). At \(a=0\), the scalar point belongs to \(V\) because \(\zeta\) has order \(n\). For \(a>0\), the imaginary-part argument applies again. Parallel transport preserves the diagram weights and coincides with the restriction identifications. This gives the stated estimate at \((1,0)\). Lemma 12 makes the logarithm a derivation on the moving-puncture Betti cohomology. The restriction identifications are ring isomorphisms, so this property transports to \(H^*(\mathcal Y,\mathbb Q)\). ◻ Flag push-pull and the weight boundFor the scalar correspondence at \(\lambda\), put \[\mathsf A_\lambda=\pi_{\lambda,*}\iota_\lambda^*, \qquad \mathsf B_\lambda=\iota_{\lambda,*}\pi_\lambda^*.\] Its unflagged moving-pole space is \(S\times X_\lambda\), with projection \(\mathop{\mathrm{pr}}_\lambda\). We define \[ f'=\mathop{\mathrm{pr}}_{0,*}\,\mathsf A_0 N_{0,0}^2\mathsf B_0\,\mathop{\mathrm{pr}}_0^* :H^m(X,\mathbb Q)\longrightarrow H^{m-2}(X,\mathbb Q). \tag{27}\] The flag embedding and projection have opposite degree shifts, \(2b\) and \(-2b\). Integration over the compact curve \(S\) supplies the remaining degree \(-2\). Table 1 records the individual derived morphisms and their degree and weight shifts. Section 7 derives the perverse bound from their composite over the Hitchin base. We first prove the weight bound. Proposition 23. Under nonabelian Hodge theory, the operator (27) satisfies \[f'W_jH^m(X^B,\mathbb Q)\subset W_{j-4}H^{m-2}(X^B,\mathbb Q).\] Proof. The scalar correspondence and its Gysin maps commute with the restriction identifications of Corollary 15. Thus (27) transports to the same expression at \(\lambda=1\). By Proposition 19, these identifications transport the ordinary Betti weight filtration on the full cohomology of \(X^B\). The possible difference from a chosen nonabelian-Hodge identification is one algebraic \(\Gamma\)-action, which preserves every weight subspace, including those in variant cohomology. At \(\lambda=1\), the scalar Betti space is the flat algebraic product \(S\times X^B\) of Lemma 17. Its diagram mixed Hodge structure assigns weight zero to the cochains of \(S\) and the ordinary Deligne weights to \(H^*(X^B)\). Hence both \(\mathop{\mathrm{pr}}_1^*\) and \(\mathop{\mathrm{pr}}_{1,*}\) preserve weights. The flag maps are maps of the same flat transition diagrams. Their ordinary topological Gysin maps are the diagram Gysin maps, with weight shifts \(2b\) for \(\mathsf B_1\) and \(-2b\) for \(\mathsf A_1\). These shifts cancel, while \(N_{1,0}^2\) lowers weight by four by Lemma 22. ◻ We have constructed the operator and proved its weight bound. The remaining tasks are to realize it over the Hitchin base, which gives the perverse bound, and to compute its double commutator with \(e\). Specialization over a Higgs lineWe now prove the perverse-filtration bound for the operator \(f'\) in (27). The translation is defined over a logarithmic Hitchin base away from zero on a Higgs line. Nearby cycles extend its action to the zero fiber as a sheaf endomorphism. A final integration over the moving-point curve supplies the shift by \(-2\). The essential comparison with ordinary cohomology uses the restriction isomorphisms of Corollary 15; it does not require the parameter morphism to be proper. The proper morphism and its relative translationKeep the vector \(v\) and the translation from Section 6. Let \(p_C:C\times S\to S\) be the projection and let \(\Delta\subset C\times S\) be the graph of \(x:S\to C\). The vector bundle of trace-free logarithmic Hitchin coefficients is \[\mathcal E= \bigoplus_{i=2}^n p_{C,*}\bigl(K_{C\times S/S}(\Delta)^{\otimes i}\bigr).\] We use the same notation for its total space. These direct images are locally free and commute with base change: each twisting line on a fiber has degree \(i(2g-1)>2g-2\), so its first cohomology vanishes. The inclusion of ordinary coefficient spaces defines a closed vector-subbundle embedding \[j:S\times A\hookrightarrow\mathcal E.\] Indeed both the ordinary spaces and the logarithmic spaces commute with base change, and their quotient has constant rank. Let \(D=\mathbb A^1_z\), let \(D^*=D\setminus\{0\}\), and define \[\mathcal Y_v=\mathcal Y\times_{\Lambda}D, \qquad z\longmapsto(0,zv).\] Thus its fiber at \(z\) is \(Y_{0,zv}\), including the moving-point coordinate in \(S\). Characteristic coefficients and the parameter define \[ g_v:\mathcal Y_v\longrightarrow\mathcal E\times D. \tag{28}\] Write \(g_0:Y_{0,0}\to\mathcal E\) for its zero fiber. Lemma 24. The morphism \(g_v\) is proper, and \(\mathcal Y_v\to D\) is smooth. The translation defines an automorphism \(T_v\) of \(\mathcal Y_v|_{D^*}\) over \(\mathcal E\times D^*\). Scaling gives an isomorphism \[\mathcal Y_v|_{D^*}\simeq Y_{0,v}\times D^*\] over \(D^*\), and restriction from \(H^*(\mathcal Y_v)\) to either \(Y_{0,0}\) or \(Y_{0,v}\) is an isomorphism. Proof. Smoothness and the restriction assertions follow from Proposition 14 and Corollary 15. For properness, start with the relative logarithmic Higgs Hitchin morphism over \(S\). Imposing determinant \(\mathcal O_C(dx(s))\) and trace zero gives a closed subspace. Adding a residue-invariant full flag is projective over that subspace. Finally the requirement that the ordered diagonal residues equal \(zv_i\) is closed after adjoining \(z\). The properness of the logarithmic Hitchin morphism from Section 5 therefore implies properness of (28). Coprimality ensures that the semistable limits in this argument remain stable. For \(z\ne0\) the residual eigenvalues \(zv_i\) are distinct, so the elementary modifications defining \(T_v\) and their inverses are algebraic in \(z\). They remain in the stable moduli by the trace-residue argument of Section 6. A modified Higgs field agrees with the original meromorphic Higgs field away from the pole. Their characteristic coefficients are consequently equal as sections of \(K_C(x(s))^{\otimes i}\), which proves that \(T_v\) is over \(\mathcal E\). Multiplying the Higgs field by \(z\) identifies the fiber at \(1\) with that at \(z\); division by \(z\) is its inverse. This gives the claimed product over \(D^*\). The product need not fix the Hitchin coefficient in \(\mathcal E\); only the translation must do so. ◻ Specialization and ordinary cohomologyHere is the comparison needed for the noncompact spaces in Lemma 24. Throughout, nearby cycles are unshifted; we use the nearby-cycle and proper-base-change formalism recalled in (Cataldo and Migliorini 2009, sec. 5.5 and 5.8). Lemma 25. Let \(Y\to D=\mathbb A^1\) be a smooth morphism of complex algebraic varieties, and let \(g:Y\to B\times D\) be a proper morphism commuting with the maps to \(D\). Suppose that \(Y|_{D^*}\) is isomorphic to \(Y_1\times D^*\) over \(D^*\) and that the actual restriction maps \[r_i:H^*(Y,\mathbb Q)\longrightarrow H^*(Y_i,\mathbb Q), \qquad i=0,1,\] are isomorphisms. An automorphism \(T\) of \(Y|_{D^*}\) over \(B\times D^*\) then induces an endomorphism \(\tau_0\) of \(Rg_{0,*}\mathbb Q_{Y_0}\) whose cohomological action is \[H^*(\tau_0)=r_0r_1^{-1}T_1^*r_1r_0^{-1}.\] Neither \(B\) nor \(Y_i\) is required to be proper. Proof. Smoothness gives the canonical isomorphism \(\mathbb Q_{Y_0}\simeq\psi\mathbb Q_Y\). Compatibility of nearby cycles with proper direct image gives \[Rg_{0,*}\mathbb Q_{Y_0} \simeq Rg_{0,*}\psi\mathbb Q_Y \simeq\psi(Rg_*\mathbb Q_Y).\] Apply nearby cycles to the pullback endomorphism induced by \(T\) on the punctured direct image, and use these isomorphisms to define \(\tau_0\). We verify its action on global cohomology without interchanging nearby cycles with a nonproper direct image to a point. Put \(K=Rg_*\mathbb Q_Y\) on \(B\times D\). Let \(\widetilde D^*\to D^*\) be the universal cover and write \[\widetilde j_B:B\times\widetilde D^*\longrightarrow B\times D, \qquad i_B:B\times\{0\}\hookrightarrow B\times D, \qquad \widetilde K=\widetilde j_B^*K.\] Set \(\widetilde Y^*=Y|_{D^*}\times_{D^*}\widetilde D^*\). Proper base change identifies \(\widetilde K\) with the direct image of the constant sheaf from \(\widetilde Y^*\). The nearby-cycle formula downstairs is \(\psi K=i_B^*R\widetilde j_{B,*}\widetilde K\). Restriction of this complex gives a natural morphism \[ \begin{split} R\Gamma(\widetilde Y^*,\mathbb Q) &\simeq R\Gamma(B\times D,R\widetilde j_{B,*}\widetilde K)\\ &\longrightarrow R\Gamma(B,\psi K) \simeq R\Gamma(Y_0,\mathbb Q). \end{split} \tag{29}\] The last isomorphism uses proper nearby-cycle compatibility and smoothness of \(Y\to D\). The composite of (29) with restriction from \(R\Gamma(Y,\mathbb Q)\) is ordinary restriction to \(Y_0\). Indeed the specialization unit for \(K\) corresponds, under proper direct image, to the unit \(\mathbb Q_{Y_0}\to\psi\mathbb Q_Y\), which is the canonical smooth isomorphism used above. Choose a lift of \(1\in D^*\). The assumed product and the contractibility of \(\widetilde D^*\) identify \(H^*(\widetilde Y^*)\) with \(H^*(Y_1)\) by actual restriction to that lift. Pullback from \(H^*(Y)\) therefore becomes \(r_1\) and is an isomorphism. Since its composite with (29) is \(r_0\), the latter map is also an isomorphism on cohomology. The comparison was constructed on \(B\times D\) so that it is equivariant for the required operator: because \(T\) is over \(B\times D^*\), it induces an endomorphism of \(K|_{B\times D^*}\) and hence of \(\widetilde K\), \(R\widetilde j_{B,*}\widetilde K\), and \(\psi K\). Every arrow in (29) respects these actions. Restricting at the chosen lift identifies the action on its domain with \(T_1^*\), and its action on the codomain is \(H^*(\tau_0)\). Thus the displayed formula for \(H^*(\tau_0)\) follows. No extension of \(T\) to an automorphism of \(Y\) is asserted or needed. ◻ Apply Lemma 25 to (28). The resulting endomorphism \(\tau_0\) of \(Rg_{0,*}\mathbb Q_{Y_{0,0}}\) acts on cohomology as the translation transported to \(Y_{0,0}\) by Corollary 15. In particular its action is the operator whose logarithm is \(N_{0,0}\) in Section 6. A finite polynomial suffices to realize this logarithm over the Hitchin base. Choose \(M\) as in Lemma 22, and choose an integer \(r\ge1\) for which \((\mathsf T^M-1)^r=0\) on total cohomology. Put \[p(t)=\frac1M\sum_{a=1}^{r-1} \frac{(-1)^{a+1}}{a}(t^M-1)^a.\] The polynomial \(p(\tau_0)\) is a legitimate endomorphism of \(Rg_{0,*}\mathbb Q_{Y_{0,0}}\), and its action on cohomology is \(N_{0,0}\). No unipotence assertion about \(\tau_0\) in the derived category is needed. The derived shiftWe have now realized the middle operator in \(f'\) over the Hitchin base. We next include the flag correspondence and the moving-point integration, keeping every shift explicit. Proposition 26. The operator \(f'\) of (27) is induced by a morphism \[ Rh_*\mathbb Q_X\longrightarrow Rh_*\mathbb Q_X[-2] \tag{30}\] in the constructible derived category on \(A\). Consequently \[f'(P_kH^m(X,\mathbb Q))\subseteq P_{k-2}H^{m-2}(X,\mathbb Q)\] for all integers \(m,k\). Proof. Let \(O_0=S\times X\) using the scalar product identification of Lemma 13, and write \(q=\operatorname{id}_S\times h\). Both maps in the scalar flag correspondence of Figure 1 at \(\lambda=0\) are over \(\mathcal E\). The flag projection has relative complex dimension \(b\), and the scalar inclusion has complex codimension \(b\). Thus their pullbacks and proper Gysin maps give, with \[\begin{gathered} F_O=j_*Rq_*\mathbb Q_{O_0},\qquad F_Y=Rg_{0,*}\mathbb Q_{Y_{0,0}},\\ F_Z=R(g_0\circ\iota)_*\mathbb Q_{Z_0}, \end{gathered}\] morphisms \[\mathsf B_0:F_O\longrightarrow F_Y[2b], \qquad \mathsf A_0:F_Y\longrightarrow F_O[-2b].\] Composing these with the appropriate shifts of \(p(\tau_0)^2\) gives an endomorphism of \(F_O\) with zero net shift. Its cohomological action is \(\mathsf A_0N_{0,0}^2\mathsf B_0\). Since direct image by the closed embedding \(j\) is fully faithful, this is an endomorphism of \(Rq_*\mathbb Q_{O_0}\) over \(S\times A\). Let \(p_S:S\times A\to A\) be the projection, and write \(K=Rh_*\mathbb Q_X\). The product identification gives \[Rp_{S,*}Rq_*\mathbb Q_{O_0} \simeq K\otimes R\Gamma(S,\mathbb Q).\] Push the preceding endomorphism to \(A\), precompose with the projection unit \(K\to K\otimes R\Gamma(S,\mathbb Q)\), and postcompose with the orientation trace \[K\otimes R\Gamma(S,\mathbb Q)\longrightarrow K[-2].\] This constructs (30). On ordinary cohomology the unit is \(\operatorname{pr}_0^*\), the trace is \(\operatorname{pr}_{0,*}\), and the middle map is the flag composite already identified. Hence the resulting operator is exactly \(f'\). For completeness, set \(K_{\mathrm{norm}}=K[R]\), the normalization used in the statement of the theorem. Functoriality of perverse truncation applied to (30) gives \[{}^p\tau_{\le k}K_{\mathrm{norm}} \longrightarrow{}^p\tau_{\le k}(K_{\mathrm{norm}}[-2]) =({}^p\tau_{\le k-2}K_{\mathrm{norm}})[-2].\] Taking hypercohomology in degree \(m-R\) and then its image in ordinary cohomology proves the stated inclusion. This uses neither a splitting nor multiplicativity of the perverse filtration. ◻ We finish by recording the derived morphisms and their shifts. Retain the complexes \(F_O,F_Z,F_Y\) and \(K\) from the proof, and put \(K_S=K\otimes R\Gamma(S,\mathbb Q)\). The first panel of Table 1 consists of morphisms on \(\mathcal E\). Compose the flag maps and \(p(\tau_0)^2\) there to obtain an endomorphism of \(F_O\), descend it through \(j\), and then apply \(Rp_{S,*}\). This produces the degree-zero endomorphism of \(K_S\) in the second panel, whose base is \(A\). The unit and trace then give \(K\to K[-2]\); it is this complete morphism that yields the normalized perverse bound above. No perverse exactness of \(Rp_{S,*}\) is used. The weight columns refer to the cohomological actions after transport to \(\lambda=1\) and use the diagram weights of Section 4. In particular \(p(\tau_0)\) acts as \(N_{1,0}\) after this comparison, while the unit and trace preserve weight because the cochains of \(S\) have weight zero.
The translation class and the double commutatorThe preceding sections give the two filtration bounds for the same operator \(f'\). We now compute its double commutator with \(e\). The calculation has two parts: an elementary modification differentiates the universal degree-two class into a difference of flag classes, and flag integration converts the square of that difference back into \(e\). The characteristic class under translationThe universal projective bundle on \(C\times\mathcal Y\) defines a universal endomorphism bundle. Let \[e_{\mathcal Y} =\frac1{2n}\int_C\operatorname{ch}_2(\operatorname{End}E) \in H^2(\mathcal Y,\mathbb Q).\] Individual ordered flag lines \(Q_i\) can be taken on local universal-bundle charts; their ratios \(Q_i\otimes Q_j^{-1}\) descend to the coarse moduli space. We use the global classes \[y=c_1(Q_1\otimes Q_2^{-1}),\qquad t_C=x^*c_1(T_C),\] where the second is pulled back from \(S\). We retain the same notation for the restrictions of these classes to a fiber \(Y_{\lambda,u}\). Lemma 27. For the translation \(T:Y_{0,v}\to Y_{0,v}\) associated with \(\ell=(1,-1,0,\ldots,0)\) and every integer \(k\ge0\), \[ T^{k*}e_{\mathcal Y}=e_{\mathcal Y}+ky+k^2t_C. \tag{31}\] Consequently the logarithm from Section 6 satisfies \[ N(e_{\mathcal Y})=y \tag{32}\] on \(H^*(\mathcal Y,\mathbb Q)\) and, by restriction, on every fiber. Proof. Work first on \(Y_{0,v}\). Denote by \(i:\Delta\hookrightarrow C\times Y_{0,v}\) the graph of the moving point. Its normal line is the pullback of \(x^*T_C\), so \[\mathcal O(\Delta)|_\Delta\simeq x^*T_C, \qquad c_1(N_\Delta)=t_C.\] The residue eigenvalues \(v_i\) are distinct. Consequently the Higgs operator has uniquely labeled eigenline summands on the formal neighborhood of \(\Delta\). This follows by lifting its simple residual eigenvalues and their idempotent projectors to every finite order. Multiplying a local frame of the logarithmic canonical line by a unit does not change those projectors. Thus the formal summands are intrinsic, and any finite number of their jets suffices for an elementary modification. The \(k\)-fold translation replaces the \(i\)th formal line lattice by its twist by \(k\ell_i\Delta\). On the \((i,j)\) block of \(\operatorname{End}E\), the lattice shift is therefore \[m_{ij}=k(\ell_i-\ell_j).\] If a line block has restriction \(F\) to \(\Delta\), its K-theory change under an integer shift \(m\) is \[ [\text{new block}]-[\text{old block}] =\sum_{a=1}^{m}[i_*(F\otimes N_\Delta^{\otimes a})]. \tag{33}\] For \(m<0\), the right side means the negative of the sum over \(m<a\le0\); for \(m=0\) it is zero. For positive \(m\), the formula follows by successive quotients of the lattices at pole orders \(1,\ldots,m\). For negative \(m\), apply the same quotient sequence between the smaller lattice and the original one. In particular \(m=-1\) contributes \(-[i_*F]\), as it must for the kernel elementary transformation. The resulting identity for \(\operatorname{End}E\) is global in K-theory, before applying a characteristic class. Indeed the intrinsic formal idempotents lie in the descended endomorphism algebra, so its \((i,j)\) blocks are global formal line bundles. Identify the original and modified endomorphism bundles away from \(\Delta\), and choose a common sufficiently small lattice inside both. Their quotients by this lattice are supported on a finite infinitesimal neighborhood of \(\Delta\). The formal block projectors and the filtration by pole order give global finite filtrations of these quotients. Their associated graded terms are graph pushforwards of the descended line bundles \(Q_i\otimes Q_j^{-1}\otimes N_\Delta^{\otimes a}\). Subtracting the two quotient classes cancels the common pole orders and leaves exactly the signed sums in (33). Additivity for these filtrations therefore gives the identity in the Grothendieck group of coherent sheaves on \(C\times Y_{0,v}\); the common lattice also cancels. Grothendieck–Riemann–Roch for the graph (Fulton 1998, sec. 15.2) gives \[\operatorname{ch}(i_*F) =i_*\bigl(\operatorname{ch}(F)\operatorname{td}(N_\Delta)^{-1}\bigr).\] Hence the contribution of a summand in (33) to \(\int_C\operatorname{ch}_2\) is \[c_1(F)+(a-\tfrac12)t_C.\] This also exhibits the sign of the normal-bundle correction: the normal line is the tangent line, and its inverse Todd class starts with \(1-t_C/2\). For the signed sums just specified, the elementary identities \[\sum_{a=1}^{m}1=m, \qquad \sum_{a=1}^{m}(a-\tfrac12)=\frac{m^2}{2}\] hold for every integer \(m\). Write \(w_i=c_1(Q_i)\) on a universal-bundle chart. Only \(w_i-w_j\) and expressions invariant under common translation of the \(w_i\) will occur. Summing the contributions for \(F=Q_i\otimes Q_j^{-1}\) gives \[T^{k*}e_{\mathcal Y}-e_{\mathcal Y} =\frac1{2n}\sum_{i,j} \left(k(\ell_i-\ell_j)(w_i-w_j) +\frac{k^2}{2}(\ell_i-\ell_j)^2t_C\right).\] Since \(\sum_i\ell_i=0\), \[\sum_{i,j}(\ell_i-\ell_j)(w_i-w_j)=2n\sum_i\ell_iw_i, \qquad \sum_{i,j}(\ell_i-\ell_j)^2=2n\sum_i\ell_i^2.\] For the chosen cocharacter these are \(2ny\) and \(4n\), respectively, proving (31). Since the lattice identity was global on the coarse moduli space before applying Grothendieck–Riemann–Roch, this is a global cohomological identity there. Let \(M\) be the integer used to define \(N\). Replace \(k\) by \(Mq\) in (31). Since \(\mathsf T^{Mq}=\exp(MqN)\), both sides are polynomial functions of the nonnegative integer \(q\) with values in a finite-dimensional cohomology group. They agree as polynomials. Their linear coefficients are respectively \(MN(e_{\mathcal Y})\) and \(My\), giving (32) on \(Y_{0,v}\). Corollary 15 transports this identity to \(H^*(\mathcal Y)\) and then to all its fibers: the three classes in (31) are restrictions of the global classes just defined. ◻ The quadratic term in (31) is consistent with the behavior of the flag lines themselves. Restricting a shifted lattice to \(\Delta\) gives \[T^{k*}y=y+2kt_C, \qquad N(y)=2t_C, \qquad N(t_C)=0.\] In particular one must not assume \(N(y)=0\) in the commutator calculation. The flag integralWe record explicitly the permutation identity that evaluates the flag correspondence. It applies to projective bundles because every polynomial used below is invariant under simultaneous translation of the roots. Lemma 28. Let \(\pi:\operatorname{Fl}(V)\to B\) be the full-flag bundle of a rank-\(n\) complex vector bundle, and let \(w_1,\ldots,w_n\) be its formal Chern roots. For a polynomial \(F\) in the first Chern classes of the ordered flag lines, \[\pi_*\bigl(F(Q_\bullet)c_b(T_\pi)\bigr) =\sum_{\sigma\in\mathfrak S_n} F(w_{\sigma(1)},\ldots,w_{\sigma(n)}).\] If \(\sum_i\ell_i=0\), then \[ \sum_{\sigma\in\mathfrak S_n} \left(\sum_i\ell_iw_{\sigma(i)}\right)^2 =n(n-2)!\|\ell\|^2 \left(\sum_iw_i^2-\frac{(\sum_iw_i)^2}{n}\right). \tag{34}\] Both identities, when their expressions are invariant under common translation of the roots, hold for the associated flag bundle of a principal \(\mathrm{PGL}_n\)-bundle with rational coefficients. Proof. The projective-bundle pushforward formula is a sum over the roots, with denominator the product of the other-root differences. Iterating it along the full-flag tower gives the sum over ordered roots, with denominator the tangent Euler class at that ordering. Multiplication by \(c_b(T_\pi)\) cancels this denominator, giving the first identity. One may perform this calculation after passing to a splitting space and inverting root differences; the resulting equality is a polynomial identity in the universal Chern classes, so it holds without the inversion. The projective-bundle pushforward is characterized by its Chern-polynomial relation and the normalization that the top power of the hyperplane class integrates to one; using the complex tangent Euler class fixes the orientation signs in the displayed cancellation. For (34), a fixed root occurs \((n-1)!\) times at a fixed position, and a fixed ordered pair of distinct roots occurs \((n-2)!\) times at two prescribed distinct positions. Since \(\sum_{i\ne j}\ell_i\ell_j=-\|\ell\|^2\), expansion of the square gives \[\begin{split} &(n-1)!\|\ell\|^2\sum_iw_i^2 -(n-2)!\|\ell\|^2\sum_{i\ne j}w_iw_j\\ &\hspace{15mm} =n(n-2)!\|\ell\|^2 \left(\sum_iw_i^2-\frac{(\sum_iw_i)^2}{n}\right). \end{split}\] Finally, rational pullback from \(B\mathrm{PGL}_n\) to \(B\mathrm{GL}_n\) is injective: on a maximal torus it is the inclusion of symmetric polynomials in the root differences into symmetric polynomials in all roots. Universal characteristic-class identities invariant under common root translation can therefore be checked after this pullback, proving the last assertion. ◻ The common lowering operatorProposition 29. Let \(\delta=\deg(x:S\to C)\). The operator \(f'\) of (27) satisfies \[ [[f',e],e]=8(-1)^b n(n-2)!\delta\,e. \tag{35}\] Consequently \[ f=\frac{(-1)^{b+1}}{4n(n-2)!\delta}\,f' \tag{36}\] has cohomological degree \(-2\), lowers perversity by two and Betti weights by four, and satisfies \([[f,e],e]=-2e\). Proof. Work on the scalar correspondence at \(\lambda=0\). The restriction of \(e_{\mathcal Y}\) along \(\iota:Z_0\hookrightarrow Y_{0,0}\) equals \(\pi^*\operatorname{pr}_0^*e\): the universal projective characteristic class is unchanged by the line twist \(J\) in the scalar product identification. Projection formulas therefore show that the maps outside \(N_{0,0}^2\) in \(f'\) intertwine multiplication by the corresponding classes \(e\) and \(e_{\mathcal Y}\). For a degree-zero derivation \(N\) and an even class \(a\), write \(m_a\) for multiplication by \(a\). Then \([N,m_a]=m_{N(a)}\), and direct expansion gives \[[[N^2,m_a],m_a]=2m_{N(a)^2}.\] Indeed the first commutator is \(m_{N^2(a)}+2m_{N(a)}N\); the first term commutes with \(m_a\), while the second contributes \(2m_{N(a)^2}\). Thus no vanishing assertion about \(N^2(a)\) is needed. By Lemma 27, \[ [[f',e],e] =2\operatorname{pr}_{0,*}\mathsf A_0 (y^2\cup-)\mathsf B_0\operatorname{pr}_0^*. \tag{37}\] The normal bundle of \(\iota\) is \(T_\pi^*\). Self-intersection therefore replaces \(\iota^*\iota_*\) in (37) by \[c_b(T_\pi^*)\cup-=(-1)^b c_b(T_\pi)\cup-.\] For a class pulled back from \(X\), the projection formula and Lemma 28 reduce the flag integral to the symmetric class \[\begin{split} \sum_{\sigma\in\mathfrak S_n} (w_{\sigma(1)}-w_{\sigma(2)})^2 &=2n(n-2)! \left(\sum_iw_i^2-\frac{(\sum_iw_i)^2}{n}\right)\\ &=4n(n-2)!\,\widetilde{\operatorname{ch}}_2(E_{x(s)}). \end{split}\] Here \(E_{x(s)}\) denotes the universal projective data restricted to the graph of \(x\); the normalized expression is well defined without an honest universal vector bundle. Under \(O_0\simeq S\times X\), this characteristic class is the pullback of \(\widetilde{\operatorname{ch}}_2(E)\) from \(C\times X\) along \(x\times\operatorname{id}_X\). Tensoring by \(J\) contributes nothing to it. Integration along \(S\) multiplies integration along \(C\) by \(\delta\): \[\operatorname{pr}_{0,*} \widetilde{\operatorname{ch}}_2(E_{x(s)})=\delta e.\] This follows directly from the degree formula \(x_*[S]=\delta[C]\), or from the \(C\)-degree-two term in the Künneth decomposition. The other curve degrees integrate to zero. Combining this equality, the factor \(2\) in (37), and the self-intersection sign proves (35). The integer \(\delta\) is positive because \(x\) is a nonempty finite étale cover of connected projective curves. Thus (36) is a nonzero rational rescaling and gives the stated double commutator. The degree of \(f'\) is \(-2\), since the two flag shifts cancel and integration over \(S\) has degree \(-2\). The filtration bounds are Propositions 26 and 23; they are unchanged by the rescaling. ◻ Equality of the filtrationsWe assemble the preceding results on the same vector space \(H^*(X,\mathbb Q)\), identified with \(H^*(X^B,\mathbb Q)\) by nonabelian Hodge theory. Proof of Theorem 1. First take \(L=\mathcal O_C(dx_0)\). Proposition 4 gives hard Lefschetz for cup product by \(e\) on \(\mathop{\mathrm{Gr}}^P H^*(X)\), with grading shift two and center \(R\). Section 3 gives the same statement on \(\mathop{\mathrm{Gr}}^W H^*(X^B)\) when actual weight \(2k\) is assigned grade \(k\). It also proves that all odd weight-graded pieces vanish. Let \(\delta=\deg(S\to C)>0\) and set \[f=\frac{(-1)^{b+1}}{4n(n-2)!\,\delta}\,f'.\] Propositions 23 and 26 show that \(f\) lowers the half-weight filtration and the perverse filtration by two. The calculation in Section 8 gives \([[f,e],e]=-2e\). Apply Proposition 5 to \(P_k\) and \(W_{2k}\). It follows that \(P_kH^m(X)=W_{2k}H^m(X^B)\) in every cohomological degree. The vanishing of odd weight-graded pieces gives \(W_{2k}=W_{2k+1}\). For arbitrary \(L\in\mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}^d(C)\), choose \(M\in\mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}^0(C)\) with \(M^n\simeq L\otimes\mathcal O_C(-dx_0)\). Tensoring by \(M\) identifies the Higgs spaces over the Hitchin base. Proposition 19 proves that this identification transports the full Betti weight filtration as well. This proves the theorem for every determinant. ◻ Corollary 30. Let \(C\) be a smooth projective complex curve of genus \(g\ge2\), let \(n\ge2\) and \(d\) be coprime integers, and let \(L\in\mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}^d(C)\). For the moduli space \(X\) of stable rank-\(n\), determinant-\(L\), trace-free Higgs bundles and its corresponding twisted \(\mathop{\mathrm{SL}}_n\) character variety \(X^B\), nonabelian Hodge theory identifies \[P_k H^m(X,\mathbb Q)=W_{2k}H^m(X^B,\mathbb Q)=W_{2k+1}H^m(X^B,\mathbb Q) \qquad\text{for all integers }m,k.\] The equality holds on full rational cohomology, including its \(\mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}^0(C)[n]\)-variant part. Proof. The composite ranks are Theorem 1; the prime ranks are (Maulik and Shen 2024, Theorem 0.3). ◻ Corollary 31 (Endoscopic weight compatibility). Keep \(C,n,d,L\) as in the preceding corollary. Put \(\Gamma=\mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}^0(C)[n]\), let \(\gamma\in\Gamma\) have order \(m\), and let \(\kappa\in\widehat{\Gamma}\) be the character \(\kappa(\gamma')=\langle\gamma,\gamma'\rangle_\Gamma\) defined by the Weil pairing in (Maulik and Shen 2021, sec. 1.3). Let \(\pi:C'\to C\) be the associated cyclic étale cover, set \(r=n/m\), and put \[d_\gamma=\operatorname{codim}_{\mathcal A^{K_C}}\mathcal A_\gamma^{K_C},\] where \(\mathcal A_\gamma^{K_C}\) is their endoscopic Hitchin base. For \(D=K_C\) and \(D'=\pi^*K_C=K_{C'}\), let \(\mathfrak p_\kappa^B\) denote their nonabelian-Hodge-transported operator in (Maulik and Shen 2021, sec. 5.4). Write \(\widetilde{\mathcal M}_{r,d}^B(C')\) for the full degree-\(d\) twisted \(\mathop{\mathrm{GL}}_r\) character variety and \(\mathcal M_{n,L}^B(C)=X^B\) for the fixed-determinant twisted \(\mathop{\mathrm{SL}}_n\) character variety. On complexified cohomology, for all integers \(i,k\ge0\), \[\begin{gathered} \mathfrak p_\kappa^B\!\left(W_{2k}H^i(\widetilde{\mathcal M}_{r,d}^B(C'),\mathbb C)\right)\\ =W_{2k+2d_\gamma}H^{i+2d_\gamma}(\mathcal M_{n,L}^B(C),\mathbb C)_\kappa, \end{gathered}\] where the subscript \(\kappa\) denotes the pullback-action summand on which \(\gamma'^*\alpha=\kappa(\gamma')\alpha\) for every \(\gamma'\in\Gamma\). Proof. Since \(r\mid n\), one has \(\gcd(r,d)=1\), and étale Riemann–Hurwitz gives \(g(C')=m(g-1)+1\ge2\). The all-rank \(\mathop{\mathrm{GL}}_r\) theorem (Maulik and Shen 2024, Theorem 0.2) therefore identifies \(W_{2k}\) with \(P_k\) on the source, including when \(r=1\). The preceding corollary identifies \(P_{k+d_\gamma}\) with \(W_{2k+2d_\gamma}\) on the target after complexification and passage to the \(\Gamma\)-\(\kappa\) summand: the \(\Gamma\)-action preserves both filtrations, and the target nonabelian-Hodge identification is \(\Gamma\)-equivariant. With the common defect normalization, (Maulik and Shen 2021, Theorem 5.4) gives the exact image of \(P_kH^i\) as \(P_{k+d_\gamma}H^{i+2d_\gamma}_\kappa\). Writing \(\eta_s,\eta_t\) for the source and target nonabelian-Hodge cohomology identifications from Betti to Dolbeault, the definition \(\mathfrak p_\kappa^B=\eta_t^{-1}\mathfrak p_\kappa\eta_s\) then gives the claim. Its nonzero scalar ambiguity does not affect images. ◻ The standard implication from \(P=W\) to perverse multiplicativity (M. A. de Cataldo et al. 2022, sec. 0.4.3, equation (10)) now applies to the full fixed-determinant cohomology. Corollary 32 (Multiplicativity of the perverse filtration). In the setting of the all-rank corollary above, use the normalization (2). For all \(i,j\ge0\) and \(a,b\in\mathbb Z\), \[P_aH^i(X,\mathbb Q)\smile P_bH^j(X,\mathbb Q) \subseteq P_{a+b}H^{i+j}(X,\mathbb Q).\] Put \(\Gamma=\mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}^0(C)[n]\) and \(P_aH^i(X,\mathbb C)=P_aH^i(X,\mathbb Q)\otimes_{\mathbb Q}\mathbb C\). For the pullback-action isotypic parts indexed by \(\chi,\psi\in\widehat\Gamma =\operatorname{Hom}(\Gamma,\mathbb C^\times)\), one also has \[\bigl(P_aH^i(X,\mathbb C)\bigr)_\chi\smile \bigl(P_bH^j(X,\mathbb C)\bigr)_\psi \subseteq\bigl(P_{a+b}H^{i+j}(X,\mathbb C)\bigr)_{\chi\psi}.\] This includes trivial and distinct characters, with the same normalized \(P\) on every character summand. Proof. The nonabelian-Hodge diffeomorphism induces a graded ring isomorphism \(\eta:H^*(X^B,\mathbb Q)\to H^*(X,\mathbb Q)\) (Hausel and Thaddeus 2003, sec. 2 and 5). Cup product is a morphism of mixed Hodge structures (Deligne 1974, Corollaire (8.2.11)), so it sends \(W_{2a}H^i(X^B,\mathbb Q)\smile W_{2b}H^j(X^B,\mathbb Q)\) into \(W_{2(a+b)}H^{i+j}(X^B,\mathbb Q)\). Transport by \(\eta\) and the all-rank \(P=W\) equality give the first assertion. The filtration is \(\Gamma\)-stable, and \(\gamma^*(\alpha\smile\beta)=\gamma^*\alpha\smile\gamma^*\beta\) multiplies the two eigencharacters, giving the second assertion. ◻
Beilinson, Alexander A., Joseph Bernstein, and Pierre Deligne. 1982. “Faisceaux Pervers.” Astérisque 100: 5–171.
Białynicki-Birula, Andrzej. 1973. “Some Theorems on Actions of Algebraic Groups.” Annals of Mathematics, 2nd series, vol. 98 (3): 480–97. https://doi.org/10.2307/1970915.
Cataldo, Mark Andrea A. de, and Andres Fernandez Herrero. 2024. “Geometry of the Logarithmic Hodge Moduli Space.” Journal of the London Mathematical Society 109 (1): e12857. https://doi.org/10.1112/jlms.12857.
Cataldo, Mark Andrea A. de, Tamás Hausel, and Luca Migliorini. 2012. “Topology of Hitchin Systems and Hodge Theory of Character Varieties: The Case \(A_1\).” Annals of Mathematics 175 (3): 1329–407. https://doi.org/10.4007/annals.2012.175.3.7.
Cataldo, Mark Andrea A. de, Davesh Maulik, and Junliang Shen. 2022. “On the \(P=W\) Conjecture for \(\mathrm{SL}_n\).” Selecta Mathematica 28: 90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00029-022-00803-0.
Cataldo, Mark Andrea A. de, and Luca Migliorini. 2009. “The Decomposition Theorem, Perverse Sheaves and the Topology of Algebraic Maps.” Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 46 (4): 535–633. https://arxiv.org/abs/0712.0349v2.
Cataldo, Mark Andrea de, Davesh Maulik, and Junliang Shen. 2022. “Hitchin Fibrations, Abelian Surfaces, and the \(P=W\) Conjecture.” Journal of the American Mathematical Society 35 (3): 911–53. https://doi.org/10.1090/jams/989.
Corlette, Kevin. 1988. “Flat \(G\)-Bundles with Canonical Metrics.” Journal of Differential Geometry 28 (3): 361–82. https://doi.org/10.4310/jdg/1214442469.
Deligne, Pierre. 1970. Équations Différentielles à Points Singuliers réguliers. Vol. 163. Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0061194.
Deligne, Pierre. 1971. “Théorie de Hodge II.” Publications Mathématiques de l’IHÉS 40: 5–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02684692.
Deligne, Pierre. 1974. “Théorie de Hodge III.” Publications Mathématiques de l’IHÉS 44: 5–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685881.
Donaldson, S. K. 1987. “Twisted Harmonic Maps and the Self-Duality Equations.” Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, 3rd series, vol. 55 (1): 127–31. https://doi.org/10.1112/plms/s3-55.1.127.
Fernandez Herrero, Andres, and Siqing Zhang. 2025. Meromorphic Hodge Moduli Spaces for Reductive Groups in Arbitrary Characteristic. arXiv:2307.16755v2. https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.16755v2.
Fulton, William. 1998. Intersection Theory. 2nd ed. Vol. 2. Ergebnisse Der Mathematik Und Ihrer Grenzgebiete, 3. Folge. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1700-8.
Hausel, Tamás, Emmanuel Letellier, and Fernando Rodriguez-Villegas. 2011. “Arithmetic Harmonic Analysis on Character and Quiver Varieties.” Duke Mathematical Journal 160 (2): 323–400. https://doi.org/10.1215/00127094-1444258.
Hausel, Tamás, Anton Mellit, Alexandre Minets, and Olivier Schiffmann. 2025. \(P=W\) via \(\mathcal H_2\). arXiv:2209.05429v2. https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.05429v2.
Hausel, Tamás, and Fernando Rodriguez-Villegas. 2008. “Mixed Hodge Polynomials of Character Varieties.” Inventiones Mathematicae 174 (3): 555–624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00222-008-0142-x.
Hausel, Tamás, and Fernando Rodriguez-Villegas. 2015. “Cohomology of Large Semiprojective Hyperkähler Varieties.” Astérisque 370: 113–56. https://arxiv.org/abs/1309.4914.
Hausel, Tamás, and Michael Thaddeus. 2003. “Mirror Symmetry, Langlands Duality, and the Hitchin System.” Inventiones Mathematicae 153: 197–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00222-003-0286-7.
Hausel, Tamás, and Michael Thaddeus. 2004. “Generators for the Cohomology Ring of the Moduli Space of Rank 2 Higgs Bundles.” Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, 3rd series, vol. 88 (3): 632–58. https://doi.org/10.1112/S0024611503014618.
Hitchin, N. J. 1987. “The Self-Duality Equations on a Riemann Surface.” Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, 3rd series, vol. 55 (1): 59–126. https://doi.org/10.1112/plms/s3-55.1.59.
Hitchin, Nigel. 1987. “Stable Bundles and Integrable Systems.” Duke Mathematical Journal 54 (1): 91–114. https://doi.org/10.1215/S0012-7094-87-05408-1.
Markman, Eyal. 2002. “Generators of the Cohomology Ring of Moduli Spaces of Sheaves on Symplectic Surfaces.” Journal für Die Reine Und Angewandte Mathematik 544: 61–82. https://doi.org/10.1515/crll.2002.028.
Maulik, Davesh, and Junliang Shen. 2021. “Endoscopic Decompositions and the Hausel–Thaddeus Conjecture.” Forum of Mathematics, Pi 9: e8. https://doi.org/10.1017/fmp.2021.7.
Maulik, Davesh, and Junliang Shen. 2024. “The \(P=W\) Conjecture for \(\mathrm{GL}_n\).” Annals of Mathematics 200 (2): 529–56. https://doi.org/10.4007/annals.2024.200.2.3.
Maulik, Davesh, Junliang Shen, and Qizheng Yin. 2025. “Perverse Filtrations and Fourier Transforms.” Acta Mathematica 234 (1): 1–69. https://doi.org/10.4310/ACTA.2025.v234.n1.a1.
Mellit, Anton. 2025. “Toric Stratifications of Character Varieties.” Publications Mathématiques de l’IHÉS 142: 153–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10240-025-00158-0.
Saito, Morihiko. 1990. “Extension of Mixed Hodge Modules.” Compositio Mathematica 74 (2): 209–34. https://www.numdam.org/item/CM_1990__74_2_209_0/.
Shende, Vivek. 2017. “The Weights of the Tautological Classes of Character Varieties.” International Mathematics Research Notices 2017 (22): 6832–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/imrn/rnv363.
Simpson, Carlos. 1997. “The Hodge Filtration on Nonabelian Cohomology.” In Algebraic Geometry—Santa Cruz 1995, Part 2, vol. 62. Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics. American Mathematical Society.
Simpson, Carlos T. 1992. “Higgs Bundles and Local Systems.” Publications Mathématiques de l’IHÉS 75: 5–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02699491.
Tubach, Swann. 2025. “Mixed Hodge Modules on Stacks.” Forum of Mathematics, Sigma 13: e175. https://doi.org/10.1017/fms.2025.10122.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||
|