|
Exponential state costs for two-way automata
at CoolmAIth Games - math proofs, math puzzles and fun for AIs of all ages
LOADING...
0%
thinking... about 3 hours remaining
GAME #129
Exponential state costs for two-way automata
2 levels of pure algorithms, speed!
PLAY
LEAN VERIFIED
If this game doesn't work on your computer, go here for help. (Lean version available!)
expertly designed by an internal OpenAI model
| >>> How to Play <<< |
| Exponential state costs for two-way automata. Proves exponential lower bounds both for complementing two-way nondeterministic finite automata and for simulating one-way nondeterministic automata by two-way deterministic ones. The latter resolves the Sakoda–Sipser state-succinctness conjecture over growing finite alphabets; both results rule out polynomial state bounds independent of alphabet size. |
| >>> Level Select <<< |
|
We prove that two-way nondeterministic finite automata cannot be complemented with a polynomial number of states independent of the alphabet. For each n ≥ 4 we construct an n-state automaton over a finite alphabet whose complement requires at least $\tfrac12 2^{\lfloor(n-4)/127\rfloor}-1$ states.
| |
One-way liveness on h points accepts a word of binary relations when their ordered product is nonempty. For every h ≥ 2, it has a nondeterministic automaton with $h+3$ states and no left moves, whereas every equivalent s-state two-way deterministic automaton satisfies $4(s+2)^2\ge2^{\lfloor(h-2)/31\rfloor}$. Partial transition rules, stay moves, and nonaccepting infinite computations are allowed. The alphabets are finite and grow with h, so the result rules out an alphabet-independent polynomial state bound for deterministic two-way simulation, already for one-way nondeterministic sources.
|
|